LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-45583: A use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.4.0, FortiOS 7.2.0 through...

A use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.4.0, FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.5, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4 all versions, FortiOS 6.2 all versions, FortiOS 6.0.0 through 6.0.16, FortiPAM 1.1.0, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions, FortiProxy 7.2.0 through 7.2.5, FortiProxy 7.0.0 through 7.0.11, FortiProxy 2.0 all versions, FortiProxy 1.2 all versions, FortiProxy 1.1 all versions, FortiProxy 1.0 all versions, FortiSwitchManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.2, FortiSwitchManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.2 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted cli commands and http requests.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2023-45583 is a Fortinet format string flaw that could let a highly privileged attacker run unauthorized code or commands. It affects multiple FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager versions. Business urgency is moderate: exploitation requires high privileges, but successful abuse could compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Executive priority

Schedule remediation through normal vulnerability management, with accelerated handling for sensitive or externally reachable management environments. The privilege requirement lowers initial-access urgency, but the possible full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact makes delayed remediation risky.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-134, use of externally controlled format string. Fortinet describes exploitation through specially crafted CLI commands and HTTP requests. CVSS v3.1 is 6.5 with local attack vector, low complexity, high privileges required, no user interaction, unchanged scope, and high CIA impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running the listed vulnerable Fortinet products and versions. Highest concern is systems where administrative CLI or HTTP management paths are reachable by privileged users or service accounts. The bundle does not identify a network-unauthenticated attack path.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not cite active exploitation, and KEV status is false. CVSS indicates exploit code maturity as functional, but the provided sources do not include weaponized details. Treat this as a privileged post-access risk rather than an initial-access emergency.

Researcher notes

Do not assume all Fortinet appliances are affected; match product and version precisely. The source bundle names affected ranges but does not provide fixed versions or detailed exploit conditions. Validation should focus on version evidence, management-plane exposure, and privileged access paths.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Fortinet FG-IR-23-137 for vendor-approved fixed versions and upgrade guidance.
  • Inventory FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager versions against the affected ranges.
  • Restrict management HTTP and CLI access to trusted administrative networks and accounts.
  • Review privileged account access, MFA, and role assignments for Fortinet management planes.
  • Prioritize upgrades for internet-adjacent or broadly administered Fortinet management systems.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm exact product and firmware versions on all Fortinet assets.
  • Compare installed versions with the affected ranges in the CVE record and Fortinet advisory.
  • Check whether management HTTP interfaces are exposed beyond intended admin networks.
  • Review administrative logs for unusual privileged CLI or HTTP management activity.
  • Document compensating controls where immediate upgrade is not possible.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-134: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-45583 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:O/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:O/RC:C0.85.9fortinet

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-45583Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:F/RL:O/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc
CVECVE Program Container

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
FortinetFortiSwitchManager7.2.0, 7.0.0unaffected
FortinetFortiOS7.4.0, 7.2.0, 7.0.0, 6.4.0, 6.2.0unaffected
FortinetFortiProxy7.2.0, 7.0.0unaffected
FortinetFortiPAM1.1.0, 1.0.0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-134 · source CWE mapping

Use of Externally-Controlled Format String

Use of Externally-Controlled Format String represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.