CVE-2023-45583: A use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.4.0, FortiOS 7.2.0 through...
A use of externally-controlled format string vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.4.0, FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.5, FortiOS 7.0 all versions, FortiOS 6.4 all versions, FortiOS 6.2 all versions, FortiOS 6.0.0 through 6.0.16, FortiPAM 1.1.0, FortiPAM 1.0 all versions, FortiProxy 7.2.0 through 7.2.5, FortiProxy 7.0.0 through 7.0.11, FortiProxy 2.0 all versions, FortiProxy 1.2 all versions, FortiProxy 1.1 all versions, FortiProxy 1.0 all versions, FortiSwitchManager 7.2.0 through 7.2.2, FortiSwitchManager 7.0.0 through 7.0.2 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted cli commands and http requests.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2023-45583 is a Fortinet format string flaw that could let a highly privileged attacker run unauthorized code or commands. It affects multiple FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager versions. Business urgency is moderate: exploitation requires high privileges, but successful abuse could compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
Executive priority
Schedule remediation through normal vulnerability management, with accelerated handling for sensitive or externally reachable management environments. The privilege requirement lowers initial-access urgency, but the possible full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact makes delayed remediation risky.
Technical view
The issue is CWE-134, use of externally controlled format string. Fortinet describes exploitation through specially crafted CLI commands and HTTP requests. CVSS v3.1 is 6.5 with local attack vector, low complexity, high privileges required, no user interaction, unchanged scope, and high CIA impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to organizations running the listed vulnerable Fortinet products and versions. Highest concern is systems where administrative CLI or HTTP management paths are reachable by privileged users or service accounts. The bundle does not identify a network-unauthenticated attack path.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not cite active exploitation, and KEV status is false. CVSS indicates exploit code maturity as functional, but the provided sources do not include weaponized details. Treat this as a privileged post-access risk rather than an initial-access emergency.
Researcher notes
Do not assume all Fortinet appliances are affected; match product and version precisely. The source bundle names affected ranges but does not provide fixed versions or detailed exploit conditions. Validation should focus on version evidence, management-plane exposure, and privileged access paths.
Mitigation direction
Review Fortinet FG-IR-23-137 for vendor-approved fixed versions and upgrade guidance.
Inventory FortiOS, FortiPAM, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager versions against the affected ranges.
Restrict management HTTP and CLI access to trusted administrative networks and accounts.
Review privileged account access, MFA, and role assignments for Fortinet management planes.
Prioritize upgrades for internet-adjacent or broadly administered Fortinet management systems.
Validation and detection
Confirm exact product and firmware versions on all Fortinet assets.
Compare installed versions with the affected ranges in the CVE record and Fortinet advisory.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-134: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
2Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-134 · source CWE mapping
Use of Externally-Controlled Format String
Use of Externally-Controlled Format String represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.