LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-45274: WordPress SendPulse Free Web Push Plugin <= 1.3.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in SendPulse SendPulse Free Web Push plugin <= 1.3.1 versions.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a medium-severity CSRF issue in the WordPress SendPulse Free Web Push plugin. A malicious site could potentially cause a visitor’s browser to perform an unintended plugin action if conditions are right. The cited data shows low integrity impact only, with no stated confidentiality or availability impact.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority WordPress hygiene issue, not an emergency based on available evidence. Prioritize internet-facing business sites using this plugin, especially where unauthorized plugin setting changes could affect customer communications or trust.

Technical view

CVE-2023-45274 is a CWE-352 CSRF vulnerability in SendPulse Free Web Push for WordPress, reported for versions <= 1.3.1. CVSS 3.1 is 4.3: network reachable, low complexity, no privileges, user interaction required, unchanged scope, and low integrity impact. Sources do not describe the exact vulnerable action.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to WordPress sites with the SendPulse Free Web Push plugin installed at version 1.3.1 or earlier. The bundle does not identify other affected products or CPEs. Sites not using this plugin are not evidenced as affected.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cite active exploitation. User interaction is required by the CVSS vector. Public evidence here is insufficient to confirm exploit availability, real-world targeting, or the specific administrative action at risk.

Researcher notes

The public bundle confirms CSRF classification, CVSS, and affected plugin/version range, but lacks endpoint-level detail, patch version, exploit status, and concrete impact scenario. Avoid assuming broader SendPulse product exposure without additional vendor evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the sendpulse-web-push plugin.
  • Check whether installed versions are 1.3.1 or earlier.
  • Review Patchstack and vendor guidance for patched versions or recommended remediation.
  • Update, disable, or remove the plugin according to verified vendor guidance.
  • Restrict plugin administration to trusted users until remediation is confirmed.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm plugin presence and version from WordPress administration or asset inventory.
  • Compare findings against the affected version statement: <= 1.3.1.
  • Review web access logs for unusual plugin-setting changes around the disclosure period.
  • Verify remediation by confirming the plugin is updated, disabled, or removed.
  • Document any compensating controls and remaining WordPress sites still exposed.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-45274 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-45274Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SendPulseSendPulse Free Web Pushsendpulse-web-push, n/aunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.