LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-45048: WordPress Social proof testimonials and reviews by Repuso Plugin <= 5.00 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Repuso Social proof testimonials and reviews by Repuso plugin <= 5.00 versions.

MediumCVSS 5.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This affects WordPress sites using Repuso’s Social proof testimonials and reviews plugin. A malicious site could trick a logged-in administrator into causing unintended plugin actions. Public data rates this as medium severity because it needs user interaction and affects integrity/availability rather than data theft. Business urgency is mainly for WordPress estates where this plugin is active.

Executive priority

Handle during normal vulnerability remediation for internet-facing WordPress sites, with higher priority where the plugin is active on business-critical sites or broadly administered. This is not presented as actively exploited in the supplied sources.

Technical view

CVE-2023-45048 is a CWE-352 CSRF issue in social-testimonials-and-reviews-widget. The CVSS 3.1 score is 5.4: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L. Sources identify affected versions up to 5.00, while one Patchstack URL references 4.97, so version evidence is not perfectly aligned.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress installations with the Repuso Social proof testimonials and reviews plugin installed and active, especially versions at or below 5.00. Organizations without this plugin are not indicated as affected by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The CVE requires user interaction and is not listed in CISA KEV in the provided bundle. No cited source here confirms active exploitation. The practical risk depends on whether an authenticated WordPress administrator can be induced to interact with attacker-controlled content.

Researcher notes

The public bundle gives CVSS, CWE, product, and affected range but not endpoint details, proof-of-concept status, or a named fixed release. Note the inconsistency between the CVE title’s <=5.00 and the Patchstack URL’s 4.97 reference.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the social-testimonials-and-reviews-widget plugin.
  • Check Repuso or Patchstack guidance for a fixed version or vendor mitigation.
  • Update the plugin if a vendor-supported fixed release is available.
  • Disable or remove the plugin where it is unnecessary or cannot be remediated.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm plugin presence and exact installed version across WordPress assets.
  • Compare installed versions against the CVE range, treating <=5.00 as potentially affected.
  • Review admin accounts and recent plugin configuration changes for unexpected activity.
  • Track vendor advisories because the provided sources do not name a specific fixed version.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-45048 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L2.82.5Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-45048Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
RepusoSocial proof testimonials and reviews by Repusosocial-testimonials-and-reviews-widget, n/aunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.