LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-4247: GiveWP <= 2.33.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to plugin deactivation

The GiveWP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.33.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the give_sendwp_disconnect function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to deactivate the SendWP plugin via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

MediumCVSS 5.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2023-4247 is a CSRF issue in the GiveWP WordPress plugin up to 2.33.3. If an attacker convinces a logged-in administrator to take a crafted action, the attacker can deactivate the SendWP plugin. Business impact is limited but could disrupt workflows that depend on SendWP.

Executive priority

Treat this as a routine but real WordPress plugin hygiene item. Prioritize sites that rely on GiveWP and SendWP for operational workflows, but do not treat it as emergency-level without evidence of exploitation.

Technical view

The issue is missing or incorrect nonce validation in GiveWP's give_sendwp_disconnect function. The CVSS 3.1 score is 5.4, with required user interaction and low integrity and availability impact. Sources identify CWE-352 and a code changeset associated with remediation.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on WordPress sites running GiveWP version 2.33.3 or earlier, especially where administrators are logged in and SendWP is installed. The provided data does not identify other affected products.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as CISA KEV in the provided bundle, and no cited source states active exploitation. Exploitation requires tricking a site administrator into performing an action, which lowers urgency compared with unauthenticated direct exploitation.

Researcher notes

The core condition is CSRF against give_sendwp_disconnect, not a direct unauthenticated plugin takeover. Research should focus on version confirmation, nonce validation in the patched code path, and whether SendWP deactivation creates operational impact in the specific environment.

Mitigation direction

  • Update GiveWP beyond 2.33.3 after confirming vendor guidance.
  • Review Wordfence and WordPress plugin change history for the fixed version.
  • Confirm the SendWP plugin remains active where business workflows need it.
  • Train administrators to avoid unexpected plugin-management links.
  • Restrict WordPress admin access to trusted users and networks where practical.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory WordPress sites using the GiveWP plugin.
  • Check installed GiveWP versions for 2.33.3 or earlier.
  • Verify whether SendWP is installed and required on each site.
  • Review plugin audit logs for unexpected SendWP deactivation.
  • Confirm updated code includes nonce validation for the disconnect action.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-4247 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L2.82.5Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-4247Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
stellarwpGiveWP – Donation Plugin and Fundraising Platform0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.