Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2023-39313 is an authenticated server-side request forgery issue in the WordPress Avada theme through 7.11.1. A logged-in attacker could make the server request unintended internal or external resources, potentially exposing sensitive information.
Executive priority
Treat this as a high-priority WordPress exposure if Avada is deployed. The business urgency depends on authentication exposure and whether the site can reach sensitive internal resources. Confirm affected versions quickly and follow vendor remediation guidance.
Technical view
The CVE describes CWE-918 SSRF in ThemeFusion Avada, affecting versions through 7.11.1. CVSS 3.1 is 7.7: network reachable, low complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, changed scope, high confidentiality impact, no integrity or availability impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running Avada through 7.11.1 where an attacker can authenticate with sufficient access. Public-facing WordPress sites with many user accounts have higher practical risk.
Exploitation context
The provided sources do not report active exploitation, and the CVE is not marked as CISA KEV. The issue still matters because SSRF can expose internal metadata, private services, or protected network responses from the web server’s perspective.
Researcher notes
Evidence is limited to the CVE description, CVSS vector, and Patchstack reference. The bundle does not provide endpoint details, proof of concept status, exploit telemetry, or a named fixed version, so validation should avoid assumptions beyond version and authentication exposure.
Mitigation direction
- Inventory WordPress sites using Avada and confirm exact theme versions.
- Check ThemeFusion, WordPress, and Patchstack guidance for the fixed version or mitigation.
- Restrict WordPress accounts to trusted users until remediation is confirmed.
- Review server egress controls for unnecessary outbound access.
- Monitor web and server logs for unusual backend fetch activity.
Validation and detection
- Confirm whether each WordPress site has Avada installed and active.
- Record Avada versions and flag any through 7.11.1.
- Check whether untrusted or low-privilege users can authenticate to affected sites.
- Review vendor advisories before declaring remediation complete.
- Verify logging covers theme-related requests and outbound server activity.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup
Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCloud metadata behavior lookup
The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2023-39313 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- High
- CVSS
- 7.7 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N3.14Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
7.7HighVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Source materials
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.