LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-38325: The cryptography package before 41.0.2 for Python mishandles SSH certificates that have critical options.

The cryptography package before 41.0.2 for Python mishandles SSH certificates that have critical options.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysisunknown

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2023-38325 affects the Python cryptography package before 41.0.2. The issue concerns mishandling SSH certificates that include critical options, which can matter where software relies on those certificate options for access decisions. Public source detail is limited, so treat exposure as dependency-driven and context-specific.

Executive priority

Track and remediate through normal vulnerability management unless your environment relies on SSH certificate validation in Python services. For those systems, prioritize upgrade validation because the issue may affect security decisions, while public evidence remains too limited to rate urgency higher.

Technical view

The CVE record states that cryptography versions before 41.0.2 mishandle SSH certificates with critical options. The bundled sources point to upstream issue, pull request, 41.0.1-to-41.0.2 comparison, PyPI history, and downstream advisories. No CVSS, CWE, or detailed affected-product matrix is provided in the bundle.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely in Python applications, appliances, or distributions using cryptography before 41.0.2 and parsing or validating SSH certificates. Systems that do not process SSH certificates are less likely to have meaningful exposure, but dependency inventories should confirm actual use.

Exploitation context

The provided bundle does not show CISA KEV listing, active exploitation, public exploit status, or weaponization evidence. The practical risk depends on whether an application processes SSH certificates with critical options in a security-relevant path.

Researcher notes

The source bundle is sparse. The central facts are package, version boundary, and SSH certificate critical-option handling. Researchers should review the upstream issue, PR, and compare view for exact behavior, then validate only within authorized applications that actually process SSH certificates.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Python cryptography to 41.0.2 or later where supported.
  • Apply vendor or distribution updates from Fedora, NetApp, or other relevant suppliers.
  • Inventory applications and appliances that bundle or depend on cryptography.
  • Prioritize systems that parse or trust SSH certificates.
  • Check vendor guidance if direct package upgrades are not possible.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed cryptography versions are 41.0.2 or later.
  • Review dependency lockfiles, container images, and appliance advisories.
  • Identify code paths that parse or validate SSH certificates.
  • Check whether SSH certificate critical options influence access decisions.
  • Document any compensating vendor guidance for systems awaiting updates.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
8

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-38325 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
7Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.