Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Certifi versions before 2023.07.22 trusted e-Tugra root certificates. Those roots were removed after public investigation into reported security issues at e-Tugra. Systems using affected Certifi versions may make TLS trust decisions using a root CA that Certifi no longer considers acceptable.
Executive priority
Treat this as a high-priority dependency hygiene issue, especially for systems relying on Python TLS validation. It is important, but the provided evidence does not support emergency active-exploitation handling.
Technical view
CVE-2023-37920 is a CWE-345 improper certificate validation issue in python-certifi versions >=2015.04.28 and <2023.07.22. The fix removes e-Tugra root certificates from Certifi’s CA bundle. CVSS is 7.5, driven by potential integrity impact over network TLS validation.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely in Python applications, containers, appliances, or packaged products using Certifi before 2023.07.22 for outbound TLS certificate validation.
Exploitation context
The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Practical risk depends on whether affected systems trust certificates chaining to the removed e-Tugra roots.
Researcher notes
Evidence centers on CA trust-store removal, not a product exploit chain. Validate actual use of Certifi at runtime because many Python libraries depend on it indirectly. Do not assume exposure from package presence alone.
Mitigation direction
- Update certifi to version 2023.07.22 or later.
- Refresh lockfiles, containers, virtual environments, and packaged application bundles.
- Check downstream vendor advisories for appliances or distributions that embed Certifi.
- Prioritize systems handling sensitive outbound TLS connections.
Validation and detection
- Inventory Certifi versions in SBOMs, lockfiles, images, and deployed Python environments.
- Confirm affected assets no longer use Certifi versions before 2023.07.22.
- Verify the deployed CA bundle no longer includes e-Tugra root certificates.
- Review Fedora, NetApp, and other vendor advisories for inherited exposure.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-345: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2023-37920 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- High
- CVSS
- 7.5 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N3.93.6Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
7.5HighVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://github.com/certifi/python-certifi/security/advisories/GHSA-xqr8-7jwr-rhp7CVE reference · x_refsource_CONFIRM
- https://github.com/certifi/python-certifi/commit/8fb96ed81f71e7097ed11bc4d9b19afd7ea5c909CVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
- https://groups.google.com/a/mozilla.org/g/dev-security-policy/c/C-HrP1SEq1ACVE reference · x_refsource_MISC
- https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5EX6NG7WUFNUKGFHLM35KHHU3GAKXRTG/CVE reference
- https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240912-0002/CVE reference
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.
