LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-36748: A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000R...

A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.16.0), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.16.0). The affected devices are configured to offer weak ciphers by default. This could allow an unauthorized attacker in a man-in-the-middle position to read and modify any data passed over to and from the affected device.

MediumCVSS 5.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Some Siemens RUGGEDCOM ROX devices used in industrial networks may allow weak encrypted connections by default. If an attacker can get between a user and the device, they may be able to read or change traffic. This is not listed as actively exploited, but it matters for critical infrastructure environments.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority industrial network hardening issue. Prioritize exposed or remotely administered RUGGEDCOM ROX devices because successful interception could affect integrity of device communications, but the known exploitation requirements are significant.

Technical view

CVE-2023-36748 is CWE-326: inadequate encryption strength. Listed Siemens RUGGEDCOM ROX models before V2.16.0 offer weak ciphers by default. CVSS 3.1 is 5.9 with adjacent-network attack vector, high complexity, no privileges, required user interaction, and confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to the listed Siemens RUGGEDCOM ROX devices running versions before V2.16.0, especially where administrative or device traffic traverses networks an attacker could intercept.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. Exploitation requires a man-in-the-middle position, adjacent network access, high attack complexity, and user interaction. The reported impact is reading and modifying traffic to and from the affected device.

Researcher notes

Evidence is strongest for affected product scope and weak default cipher behavior. The bundle names no exploit procedure and no active exploitation. Validation should focus on model/version confirmation, cipher posture, and whether a plausible man-in-the-middle path exists in the local network design.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected RUGGEDCOM ROX devices to V2.16.0 or later where supported.
  • Review Siemens SSA-146325 for product-specific remediation guidance.
  • Disable weak cipher options if Siemens guidance and operational constraints allow it.
  • Restrict management access to trusted networks and administrative hosts.
  • Monitor for unexpected certificate, session, or management-plane changes.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all listed RUGGEDCOM ROX models and record firmware versions.
  • Flag any listed device running below V2.16.0 as affected.
  • Review device TLS or cipher configuration against Siemens guidance.
  • Confirm management interfaces are not reachable from untrusted network segments.
  • Document compensating controls where firmware upgrade is delayed.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-326: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-36748 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L/E:P/RL:O/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.9CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L/E:P/RL:O/RC:C1.24.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.9Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-36748Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L/E:P/RL:O/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SiemensRUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000All versions < V2.16.0unknown
SiemensRUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000REAll versions < V2.16.0unknown
SiemensRUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400All versions < V2.16.0unknown
SiemensRUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500All versions < V2.16.0unknown
SiemensRUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501All versions < V2.16.0unknown
SiemensRUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510All versions < V2.16.0unknown
SiemensRUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511All versions < V2.16.0unknown
SiemensRUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512All versions < V2.16.0unknown
SiemensRUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524All versions < V2.16.0unknown
SiemensRUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536All versions < V2.16.0unknown
SiemensRUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000All versions < V2.16.0unknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-326 · source CWE mapping

Inadequate Encryption Strength

Inadequate Encryption Strength represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.