LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-35779: WordPress Seed Fonts Plugin 2.3.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS)

Auth. (admin+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Seed Webs Seed Fonts plugin <= 2.3.1 versions.

MediumCVSS 5.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2023-35779 is a stored cross-site scripting issue in the WordPress Seed Fonts plugin, reported for versions up to 2.3.1. An authenticated admin-level user could store script content that later runs in another user’s browser. Risk is narrower than internet-facing unauthenticated bugs, but compromised admin accounts can make it meaningful.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted WordPress hygiene item, not a broad emergency. Prioritize internet-facing business sites using Seed Fonts and any environment with shared or weakly controlled admin access.

Technical view

The source bundle describes CWE-79 stored XSS in Seed Webs Seed Fonts for WordPress, with CVSS 3.1 score 5.9 and vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L. The issue requires high privileges and user interaction, with changed scope and low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running the Seed Fonts plugin, especially version 2.3.1 or versions described as <= 2.3.1. Sites without this plugin are not affected based on the supplied sources.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or other evidence of active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation requires network access, low technical complexity, admin-level authentication, and user interaction after malicious content is stored.

Researcher notes

The available sources do not identify the vulnerable parameter, fixed version, patch commit, or exploit maturity. Do not assume broader WordPress impact beyond Seed Fonts. The high-privilege requirement materially reduces likelihood but does not eliminate risk from compromised administrators.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the Seed Fonts plugin and installed version.
  • Check Seed Webs, WordPress, or Patchstack guidance for a fixed version or vendor mitigation.
  • Upgrade, remove, or disable the plugin where vendor guidance supports that action.
  • Restrict and review WordPress admin-level accounts, especially on affected sites.
  • Monitor affected sites for unexpected plugin setting changes or injected script content.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Seed Fonts is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record the installed plugin version and compare it with <= 2.3.1 exposure.
  • Review Seed Fonts-managed settings or font content for unexpected script-like entries.
  • Review admin account activity around plugin configuration changes.
  • After remediation, confirm the plugin is upgraded, removed, or disabled.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-35779 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.9CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L1.73.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.9Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-35779Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Seed WebsSeed Fontsseed-fonts, 2.3.1unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.