LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-35352: Windows Remote Desktop Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

Windows Remote Desktop Security Feature Bypass Vulnerability

HighCVSS 7.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a high-severity Microsoft Remote Desktop security feature bypass affecting listed Windows Server versions. The public bundle indicates potential integrity impact, meaning a protection could be bypassed. It does not provide evidence of data theft, service outage, or active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority server patching item, especially for Remote Desktop systems exposed beyond tightly controlled administrative networks. Current sources do not support emergency exploitation claims.

Technical view

CVE-2023-35352 is a Windows Remote Desktop security feature bypass mapped to CWE-693. CVSS 3.1 is 7.5: network-accessible, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, unchanged scope, high integrity impact, and no confidentiality or availability impact. Microsoft is the vendor source.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Windows Server 2012, 2012 R2, 2016, 2019, and 2022 systems, including listed Server Core installations, where Remote Desktop is present or reachable.

Exploitation context

The bundle marks KEV as false and provides no cited evidence of active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates exploit code maturity is unproven and an official remediation exists, but technical exploit details are not included.

Researcher notes

Public details are sparse beyond Microsoft’s classification, affected products, CWE-693, and CVSS vector. Do not assume broader Windows client impact, exploit availability, or compensating controls beyond what Microsoft documents.

Mitigation direction

  • Review Microsoft’s advisory for CVE-2023-35352 and apply the relevant official updates.
  • Prioritize internet-facing or broadly reachable Remote Desktop servers.
  • Restrict Remote Desktop exposure to trusted networks where operationally possible.
  • Monitor Microsoft guidance for any revised affected-product or remediation details.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory servers matching the affected Windows Server versions in the source bundle.
  • Confirm whether Remote Desktop is enabled or reachable on those systems.
  • Verify applicable Microsoft security updates are installed.
  • Check external exposure of Remote Desktop services against approved access paths.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-693: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-35352 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.5CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C3.93.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.5High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-35352Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N/E:U/RL:O/RC:C

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
MicrosoftWindows Server 201910.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2019 (Server Core installation)10.0.17763.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 202210.0.20348.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 201610.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2016 (Server Core installation)10.0.14393.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 20126.2.9200.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2012 (Server Core installation)6.2.9200.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2012 R26.3.9600.0Listed
MicrosoftWindows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation)6.3.9600.0Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-693 · source CWE mapping

Protection Mechanism Failure

Protection Mechanism Failure represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.