LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-35065: SQLi in Osofts Paint Production Management

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Osoft Paint Production Management allows SQL Injection. This issue affects Paint Production Management: before 2.1.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2023-35065 is a critical SQL injection flaw in Osoft Paint Production Management versions before 2.1. A remote, unauthenticated attacker could potentially access, alter, or disrupt database-backed application data. There is no provided evidence of active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as urgent for any confirmed deployment before 2.1. Prioritize inventory, upgrade planning, and exposure reduction because the vulnerability is unauthenticated, network reachable, and rated critical. If the product is not used, document that finding and monitor for newly discovered instances.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-89 improper neutralization of SQL command elements in Osoft Paint Production Management before 2.1. CVSS 3.1 is 9.8 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction. Impacts are rated high for confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to organizations running Osoft Paint Production Management before version 2.1, especially if reachable over untrusted networks. The source data does not identify hosted, SaaS, or embedded deployment patterns.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as KEV in the provided data, and no cited source confirms active exploitation. However, the scoring indicates a remotely reachable, unauthenticated SQL injection path, which is typically high business risk when the application stores sensitive or operational data.

Researcher notes

Public detail is sparse. The CVE record and advisory identify SQL injection and affected versions before 2.1, but do not provide endpoint details, proof-of-concept status, or confirmed exploitation. One government reference is marked broken in the bundle; use the alternate advisory URL and CVE records for tracking.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify all Osoft Paint Production Management deployments and owners.
  • Upgrade systems before 2.1 to version 2.1 or later if vendor-supported.
  • If upgrade timing is unclear, check Osoft or government advisory guidance.
  • Restrict network access to trusted users and administrative networks.
  • Increase logging and monitoring around database and application errors.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed Osoft Paint Production Management version on each system.
  • Verify whether any instance is reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review application logs for SQL errors or unusual parameter activity.
  • Confirm compensating access controls are enforced at network boundaries.
  • Track vendor or government advisory updates for remediation details.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-89: Database access and collection lookup

Injection into data stores can inform collection, data access, and exfiltration detection reviews. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-35065 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
3Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9TR-CERT

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-35065Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
OsoftPaint Production Management0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-89 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.