LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-34967: Samba: type confusion in mdssvc rpc service for spotlight

A Type Confusion vulnerability was found in Samba's mdssvc RPC service for Spotlight. When parsing Spotlight mdssvc RPC packets, one encoded data structure is a key-value style dictionary where the keys are character strings, and the values can be any of the supported types in the mdssvc protocol. Due to a lack of type checking in callers of the dalloc_value_for_key() function, which returns the object associated with a key, a caller may trigger a crash in talloc_get_size() when talloc detects that the passed-in pointer is not a valid talloc pointer. With an RPC worker process shared among multiple client connections, a malicious client or attacker can trigger a process crash in a shared RPC mdssvc worker process, affecting all other clients this worker serves.

MediumCVSS 5.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2023-34967 is a Samba denial-of-service issue in the Spotlight mdssvc RPC service. A network client can send malformed mdssvc data that crashes a shared RPC worker process, disrupting other clients served by that worker. The provided sources rate it medium, with availability impact only.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate service-availability risk. It is not described as code execution or data compromise, but unauthenticated network reachability makes patching important for file services relied on by users or business workflows.

Technical view

The flaw is a type confusion in Samba mdssvc packet parsing. Callers of dalloc_value_for_key() lack type checks, allowing an unexpected object type to reach talloc_get_size(), where Samba can crash after detecting an invalid talloc pointer. CVSS is 5.3: network reachable, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, low availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Samba provides Spotlight/mdssvc functionality to network clients. The bundle identifies affected Red Hat samba packages for RHEL 8, RHEL 8.6/8.8 EUS, RHEL 9, and Red Hat Virtualization 4 on RHEL 8. RHEL 6, RHEL 7, and Red Hat Storage 3 status is listed as unknown.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show active exploitation, and KEV is false. A malicious client or attacker able to reach the mdssvc RPC service may trigger a worker process crash. The evidence supports denial of service against shared worker availability, not data theft, privilege escalation, or code execution.

Researcher notes

Focus validation on Samba mdssvc RPC parsing paths and type assumptions around dalloc_value_for_key(). The bundle’s strongest evidence is process crash behavior when talloc_get_size() receives an invalid talloc pointer. Affected product data is strongest for listed Red Hat samba packages; some older Red Hat products are marked unknown.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply vendor Samba updates from the relevant Red Hat, Samba, Debian, Fedora, or NetApp advisory.
  • Prioritize internet-exposed or broadly reachable Samba servers offering Spotlight/mdssvc functionality.
  • Restrict Samba access to trusted clients and networks while patching is scheduled.
  • Check vendor guidance before relying on any workaround not named in your platform advisory.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Samba hosts and identify whether Spotlight/mdssvc functionality is enabled or exposed.
  • Compare installed samba package versions with the affected Red Hat versions in the source bundle.
  • Confirm applicable vendor errata or security updates have been installed successfully.
  • Review logs for unexplained mdssvc or RPC worker crashes affecting multiple clients.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
11

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-843: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-34967 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
12Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L3.91.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-34967Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8samba, 0:4.18.6-1.el8affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8samba, 0:4.18.6-1.el8affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.6 Extended Update Supportsamba, 0:4.15.5-15.el8_6affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 8.8 Extended Update Supportsamba, 0:4.17.5-5.el8_8affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9samba, 0:4.18.6-100.el9affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 9samba, 0:4.18.6-100.el9affected
Red HatRed Hat Virtualization 4 for Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8samba, 0:4.15.5-15.el8_6affected
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6sambaunknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 6samba4unknown
Red HatRed Hat Enterprise Linux 7sambaunknown
Red HatRed Hat Storage 3sambaunknown
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-843 · source CWE mapping

Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion')

Access of Resource Using Incompatible Type ('Type Confusion') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.