LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-32960: WordPress UpdraftPlus Plugin <= 1.23.3 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in UpdraftPlus.Com, DavidAnderson UpdraftPlus WordPress Backup Plugin <= 1.23.3 versions leads to sitewide Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).

HighCVSS 7.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This vulnerability affects WordPress sites using UpdraftPlus Backup Plugin versions up to 1.23.3. A forged request could lead to sitewide cross-site scripting, meaning attacker-controlled script could run in visitors' or administrators' browsers. The sources rate it high severity, but do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority WordPress plugin exposure if UpdraftPlus is deployed. It can affect site trust and administrator safety, but urgency depends on whether your sites run version 1.23.3 or earlier and whether vendor remediation is available.

Technical view

CVE-2023-32960 is a CSRF issue in UpdraftPlus WordPress Backup Plugin <= 1.23.3 that can lead to sitewide XSS. CVSS 3.1 score is 7.1 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, and user interaction required. Scope is changed with limited confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on WordPress sites where the UpdraftPlus plugin package is installed at version 1.23.3 or earlier. The source bundle does not identify other products, forks, or fixed versions.

Exploitation context

The CVE data says user interaction is required and no privileges are needed for the initial attack vector. The provided sources do not state active exploitation, and the vulnerability is not marked as CISA KEV in the bundle.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to CVE and Patchstack metadata. The bundle identifies CSRF leading to sitewide XSS, affected plugin versions <= 1.23.3, CWE-352, and CVSS 7.1. It does not provide exploit details, fixed-version data, or independent exploitation confirmation.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory all WordPress sites for the UpdraftPlus plugin and installed version.
  • Check UpdraftPlus or Patchstack guidance for the fixed release before changing versions.
  • Update affected installations once vendor guidance confirms a patched version.
  • Remove or disable unnecessary affected plugin instances through normal change control.
  • Increase scrutiny of administrator sessions and unexpected sitewide script changes.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether UpdraftPlus is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record the exact plugin version and flag versions <= 1.23.3.
  • Review site content and settings for unexpected injected scripts or HTML.
  • Check WordPress administrator activity logs around suspicious configuration changes.
  • Verify remediation by confirming affected versions are no longer present.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-32960 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L2.83.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-32960Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
UpdraftPlus.Com, DavidAndersonUpdraftPlus WordPress Backup Pluginupdraftplus, n/aunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.