LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-31410: A remote unprivileged attacker can intercept the communication via e.g.

A remote unprivileged attacker can intercept the communication via e.g. Man-In-The-Middle, due to the absence of Transport Layer Security (TLS) in the SICK EventCam App. This lack of encryption in the communication channel can lead to the unauthorized disclosure of sensitive information. The attacker can exploit this weakness to eavesdrop on the communication between the EventCam App and the Client, and potentially manipulate the data being transmitted.

CriticalCVSS 9.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysiscritical

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

SICK EventCam App communications are not encrypted with TLS, so someone able to intercept network traffic could read or alter data between the app and client. The CVE rates this critical because confidentiality, integrity, and availability impacts are all high. The provided bundle identifies all versions as affected but does not name a specific patch.

Executive priority

Prioritize this where EventCam App supports safety, operational monitoring, or sensitive industrial workflows. The urgency is highest if traffic traverses networks that unauthorised users, contractors, guests, or adjacent systems can access. Confirm vendor guidance before planning final remediation.

Technical view

CVE-2023-31410 is a missing transport encryption issue in SICK EventCam App. A remote unauthenticated attacker positioned to intercept traffic, such as through man-in-the-middle access, may eavesdrop on or manipulate app-client communication. The listed CVSS v3.1 score is 9.8 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to environments using SICK EventCam App, especially where app-client traffic crosses untrusted, shared, wireless, or poorly segmented networks. The source bundle lists all versions as affected and provides no narrowing by platform, configuration, or deployment mode.

Exploitation context

The bundle supports potential remote, unauthenticated interception or manipulation when an attacker can observe the communication path. It does not provide exploit details, public exploitation evidence, or CISA KEV listing. Active exploitation should therefore not be assumed from these sources.

Researcher notes

The core issue is absence of TLS, not a cryptographic implementation flaw. The CVE record describes disclosure and possible manipulation of transmitted data. The bundle omits patch status, affected deployment prerequisites, and proof-of-concept details, so validation should focus on asset presence and communication-path exposure.

Mitigation direction

  • Check SICK PSIRT and advisory SCA-2023-0005 for current remediation guidance.
  • Isolate EventCam App traffic to trusted, segmented networks.
  • Avoid sending sensitive information through affected app-client channels on untrusted networks.
  • Monitor vendor updates for patched versions, compensating controls, or retirement guidance.
  • Review network controls for exposure to wireless, shared, or external paths.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory systems using SICK EventCam App and record deployment locations.
  • Treat all discovered versions as affected unless SICK guidance states otherwise.
  • Confirm whether app-client communication lacks TLS in the deployed environment.
  • Map who can access or intercept the relevant network path.
  • Check whether compensating segmentation or access controls are actually enforced.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-31410 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Critical
CVSS
9.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
4Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
9.8CVSS 3.1CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9SICK AG

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

9.8Critical
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-31410Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container
CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
other:ssvc

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SICK AGEventCam Appall versionsaffected
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.