LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-29146: The utility functions used by Malwarebytes EDR 1.0.11 on Linux for calculating a cryptographic hash of data...

The utility functions used by Malwarebytes EDR 1.0.11 on Linux for calculating a cryptographic hash of data bytes truncate the hashed data if it exceeds 4GB. This leads to an integer wrap-around if the data is larger than the maximum unsigned integer value (32-bit). Attackers could create a colliding hash value for two different strings by attaching 4GB of data to a string that is less than 4GB in size.

HighCVSS 8.2Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Malwarebytes EDR 1.0.11 on Linux can miscalculate hashes for data larger than 4GB because a 32-bit integer wraps. That can make different data appear to have the same hash, weakening trust in EDR integrity checks and related security decisions.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority endpoint security product issue where affected Linux deployments exist. It is not described as remotely exploitable or actively exploited, but it affects trust in EDR hashing, which can influence detection, integrity validation, and incident response confidence.

Technical view

The issue is a CWE-190 integer overflow in Malwarebytes EDR 1.0.11 Linux utility hashing functions. Inputs exceeding 4GB can be truncated during hash calculation, allowing hash collisions between distinct byte strings. CVSS 3.1 is 8.2 with local access, low complexity, high privileges, no user interaction, and changed scope.

Likely exposure

Likely limited to organizations running Malwarebytes EDR 1.0.11 on Linux. The bundle's affected-product metadata is incomplete, so teams should verify deployed versions directly against Malwarebytes guidance and asset inventory.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show active exploitation and KEV is false. The CVSS vector requires local access and high privileges, reducing broad remote risk, but successful abuse could undermine confidentiality, integrity, and availability assumptions tied to EDR hashing.

Researcher notes

Evidence is narrow but technically specific. Focus analysis on 32-bit length handling in Linux EDR hashing utilities and the security impact of collision-prone truncation. Do not assume affected versions beyond Malwarebytes EDR 1.0.11 unless vendor guidance confirms them.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory Linux hosts running Malwarebytes EDR and identify version 1.0.11.
  • Review the Malwarebytes advisory for fixed versions or supported mitigation guidance.
  • Upgrade or otherwise remediate affected installations according to vendor instructions.
  • Limit high-privilege local access to EDR-managed Linux systems.
  • Prioritize hosts handling large files or security-sensitive telemetry.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Malwarebytes EDR 1.0.11 is installed on Linux assets.
  • Check Malwarebytes advisory status for version-specific remediation details.
  • Review EDR workflows that hash files or data objects larger than 4GB.
  • Verify remediated hosts report a vendor-supported, non-affected version.
  • Document any unresolved systems and compensating access controls.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-190: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-29146 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.2 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
2Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.2CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H1.56CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.2High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-29146Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-190 · source CWE mapping

Integer Overflow or Wraparound

Integer Overflow or Wraparound represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.