CVE-2023-2885: Channel Accessible by Non-Endpoint in CBOT's Chatbot
Improper Enforcement of Message Integrity During Transmission in a Communication Channel vulnerability in CBOT Chatbot allows Adversary in the Middle (AiTM).
This issue affects Chatbot: before Core: v4.0.3.4 Panel: v4.0.3.7.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2023-2885 affects CBOT Chatbot versions before Core v4.0.3.4 and Panel v4.0.3.7. The flaw can let an adversary-in-the-middle interfere with a communication channel because message integrity is not properly enforced. Impact is potentially high for confidentiality, integrity, and availability, but exploitation requires a network positioning condition and no active exploitation is cited.
Executive priority
Treat as a high-priority remediation item if CBOT Chatbot is in use, especially in externally reachable or sensitive environments. Prioritize version verification first. Escalate patching if older Core or Panel versions are found. Current public evidence does not support emergency action based on active exploitation.
Technical view
The CVE is mapped to CWE-924 and describes improper enforcement of message integrity during transmission. CVSS 3.1 is 8.1: network attack vector, high attack complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high C/I/A impact. Affected scope is CBOT Chatbot before Core v4.0.3.4 and Panel v4.0.3.7.
Likely exposure
Organizations using CBOT Chatbot deployments older than Core v4.0.3.4 or Panel v4.0.3.7 may be exposed. Exposure is most relevant where attackers could position themselves between chatbot components or communications paths. Evidence does not show broad internet exploitation or inclusion in CISA KEV.
Exploitation context
The reported attack class is adversary-in-the-middle. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation is remote but high complexity, with no authentication or user interaction required. Public sources provided do not confirm exploit availability, active exploitation, or detailed attack prerequisites beyond communication-channel positioning.
Researcher notes
The source data is limited. One USOM reference is marked broken in the bundle, while the siberguvenlik.gov.tr advisory remains listed. The affected-version statement comes from the CVE description. No proof-of-concept, exploit status, or additional technical detail is provided in the supplied sources.
Mitigation direction
Inventory CBOT Chatbot Core and Panel versions across all environments.
Upgrade Core to v4.0.3.4 or later where applicable.
Upgrade Panel to v4.0.3.7 or later where applicable.
Review the Turkish government advisory for vendor-specific guidance.
Restrict untrusted network paths between chatbot components where feasible.
Monitor vendor channels for any updated remediation instructions.
Validation and detection
Confirm deployed Core and Panel versions from trusted asset records.
Compare versions against the affected-before thresholds in the CVE description.
Verify upgrade completion in production and non-production environments.
Check network architecture for possible intermediary access to chatbot communications.
Review logs for unusual communication errors or integrity-related anomalies.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-924: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
3Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.