LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-2620: Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data in GitLab

An issue has been discovered in GitLab CE/EE affecting all versions starting from 15.1 prior to 15.11.10, all versions from 16.0 prior to 16.0.6, all versions from 16.1 prior to 16.1.1. A maintainer could modify a webhook URL to leak masked webhook secrets by manipulating other masked portions. This addresses an incomplete fix for CVE-2023-0838.

MediumCVSS 5.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2023-2620 is a GitLab CE/EE issue where a project maintainer could manipulate a webhook URL so masked webhook secrets were leaked. The attacker already needs high project privileges, so this is not an unauthenticated takeover risk, but exposed webhook secrets can still enable follow-on misuse.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted insider-or-compromised-maintainer secret exposure issue. Prioritize patching affected GitLab instances and rotating webhook secrets where maintainers could have modified webhook URLs during the vulnerable window.

Technical view

GitLab CE/EE versions 15.1 before 15.11.10, 16.0 before 16.0.6, and 16.1 before 16.1.1 are affected. The flaw is CWE-201, sensitive information inserted into sent data, and addresses an incomplete fix for CVE-2023-0838. CVSS 3.1 is 5.5 with PR:H, UI:N, S:C, C:L, I:L, A:N.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to affected GitLab CE/EE instances with configured webhooks and users holding maintainer-level privileges. Organizations using only fixed versions or without relevant webhook secrets are less likely to be exposed.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. Public references include a GitLab issue and HackerOne report, so technical details were publicly disclosed, but exploitation requires privileged maintainer access.

Researcher notes

The key constraint is privilege: the described actor is a maintainer, not an unauthenticated user. Evidence supports confidentiality and integrity impact, not availability impact. Avoid assuming broader product impact beyond GitLab CE/EE ranges named in the CVE bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade GitLab CE/EE to 15.11.10, 16.0.6, 16.1.1, or later fixed releases.
  • Review GitLab vendor guidance for any additional version-specific remediation notes.
  • Rotate webhook secrets that may have been exposed on affected instances.
  • Restrict maintainer permissions to users with a current business need.
  • Review webhook configurations for sensitive data handling.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory GitLab CE/EE versions and compare them against the affected version ranges.
  • Identify projects or groups with webhooks configured during the vulnerable period.
  • Review audit logs for maintainer changes to webhook URLs.
  • Confirm vulnerable instances were upgraded to fixed releases.
  • Confirm potentially exposed webhook secrets were rotated.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-201: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-2620 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.32.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-2620Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
GitLabGitLab15.1, 16.0, 16.1unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-201 · source CWE mapping

Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data

Insertion of Sensitive Information Into Sent Data represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.