LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-26000: WordPress Bang tinh vay <= 1.0.1 - Cross Site Scripting (XSS) Vulnerability

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in hanhdo205 Bang tinh vay allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Bang tinh vay: from n/a through 1.0.1.

MediumCVSS 5.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This vulnerability affects the WordPress Bang tinh vay plugin through 1.0.1. A highly privileged user could store script content that later runs in another user’s browser. The impact is limited by required privileges and user interaction, but stored XSS can still create business risk on sites using the plugin.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority WordPress hygiene issue. It does not show confirmed active exploitation, but affected sites should be inventoried and remediated because stored XSS can affect users and administrators after malicious content is saved.

Technical view

CVE-2023-26000 is a stored cross-site scripting issue in hanhdo205 Bang tinh vay, package bang-tinh-lai-suat, through version 1.0.1. The CVSS 3.1 vector is AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L, indicating network reachability, high privileges required, user interaction, changed scope, and low CIA impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure appears limited to WordPress sites with Bang tinh vay, also identified as bang-tinh-lai-suat, installed at version 1.0.1 or earlier. The source bundle does not identify affected hosting providers, default installations, or broader product families.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cite active exploitation. The CVSS vector indicates exploitation requires high privileges and user interaction, which reduces likelihood compared with unauthenticated XSS, but stored content may affect later viewers inside the WordPress site.

Researcher notes

Public evidence is sparse in the supplied bundle. The strongest technical indicators are CWE-79, stored XSS wording, affected range through 1.0.1, and CVSS requiring PR:H and UI:R. No exploit details, patch version, or confirmed exploitation evidence are provided.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for Bang tinh vay or bang-tinh-lai-suat installations.
  • Check Patchstack and vendor guidance for a fixed version or removal advice.
  • Disable or remove the plugin if it is not business-critical.
  • Restrict high-privilege WordPress access to trusted administrators only.
  • Review content workflows for unexpected embedded scripts or unauthorized changes.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether the plugin is installed and record its exact version.
  • Flag installations running Bang tinh vay version 1.0.1 or earlier.
  • Review administrator and high-privilege accounts with plugin access.
  • Check whether vendor or Patchstack guidance names an updated safe version.
  • Review recent WordPress content changes for suspicious stored script content.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-26000 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.9CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L1.73.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.9Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-26000Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
hanhdo205Bang tinh vaybang-tinh-lai-suat, n/aunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.