LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-25968: WordPress Client Portal – Private user pages and login Plugin <= 1.1.8 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cozmoslabs, Madalin Ungureanu, Antohe Cristian Client Portal – Private user pages and login plugin <= 1.1.8 versions.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This CVE affects the WordPress Client Portal - Private user pages and login plugin through version 1.1.8. It is a CSRF issue, meaning an attacker may trick a logged-in user into making an unintended change. The documented impact is limited integrity impact, not data theft or service outage.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate WordPress hygiene item. It is not shown as actively exploited, but affected public sites should be inventoried and remediated because CSRF can cause unauthorized changes through legitimate users.

Technical view

CVE-2023-25968 is CWE-352 CSRF in the client-portal WordPress plugin. CVSS 3.1 is 4.3 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, and required user interaction. The provided sources identify affected versions as <= 1.1.8 but do not provide exploit details or a fixed version.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites that installed the Client Portal - Private user pages and login plugin, especially versions 1.1.8 or earlier. The bundle does not identify affected CPEs or confirm whether default installations are vulnerable.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation would require user interaction and a logged-in target context, consistent with the CVSS UI:R and CSRF classification.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse. The bundle identifies CSRF, affected plugin slug, <=1.1.8 scope, CVSS vector, and Patchstack reference, but not the vulnerable endpoint, affected action, proof-of-concept, or fixed version. Avoid assuming exploitability beyond the published CSRF classification.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the client-portal plugin and installed version.
  • Check vendor, WordPress plugin, or Patchstack guidance for a fixed release.
  • Update the plugin if an official fixed version is available.
  • Disable or remove the plugin where it is not business-critical.
  • Limit privileged WordPress sessions to trusted workflows until resolved.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether any WordPress site runs client-portal version 1.1.8 or earlier.
  • Record plugin version, installation path, and business owner for each finding.
  • Review vendor or Patchstack notes for affected actions and remediation status.
  • Confirm post-remediation version is outside the affected range.
  • Document compensating controls if the plugin cannot be updated or removed.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-25968 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-25968Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Cozmoslabs, Madalin Ungureanu, Antohe CristianClient Portal – Private user pages and loginclient-portal, n/aunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.