LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-25015: Clockwork Web before 0.1.2, when Rails before 5.2 is used, allows CSRF.

Clockwork Web before 0.1.2, when Rails before 5.2 is used, allows CSRF.

MediumCVSS 6.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Clockwork Web before 0.1.2 can allow cross-site request forgery when used with Rails before 5.2. A victim must interact with attacker-controlled content, but successful abuse could cause unauthorized state-changing actions in the Clockwork Web interface. The CVSS data rates integrity impact high, with no stated confidentiality or availability impact.

Executive priority

Prioritize normal remediation for internet-exposed or broadly accessible Clockwork Web deployments, especially where job controls affect business operations. This is not KEV-backed emergency work, but the high integrity impact means exposed administrative interfaces should not remain vulnerable.

Technical view

CVE-2023-25015 affects Clockwork Web before 0.1.2 in deployments using Rails before 5.2. It is classified as CWE-652 with CVSS 3.1 score 6.5: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N. Sources identify issue #4 and the v0.1.1-to-v0.1.2 comparison/commit as relevant, but do not detail exact vulnerable endpoints.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to applications that include clockwork_web below 0.1.2 and run it with Rails below 5.2. Publicly reachable Clockwork Web mounts increase concern. Internal-only administrative access reduces likely exposure, but does not eliminate CSRF risk when users browse untrusted content.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show active exploitation, and the CVE is not listed as KEV. Exploitation requires user interaction, consistent with CSRF, and primarily threatens integrity. The source bundle does not provide public exploit details, so exploitation status should be treated as unconfirmed.

Researcher notes

The affected scope is narrowly stated: Clockwork Web before 0.1.2 when Rails before 5.2 is used. The bundle lacks endpoint-level details, proof-of-concept status, and operational mitigations beyond the upstream version change. Avoid broad claims about all Rails or Clockwork deployments.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade clockwork_web to 0.1.2 or later where compatible.
  • Review the v0.1.2 vendor change before deployment.
  • If upgrade is delayed, restrict Clockwork Web access to trusted networks and users.
  • Check vendor guidance for any additional application-specific controls.
  • Confirm Rails version; Rails before 5.2 is part of the affected condition.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory applications using the clockwork_web gem.
  • Identify deployed clockwork_web versions and confirm whether any are below 0.1.2.
  • Confirm whether affected applications run Rails before 5.2.
  • Map where Clockwork Web is mounted and who can reach it.
  • Review regression tests around state-changing Clockwork Web actions after upgrade.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
5

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-652: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-25015 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N2.83.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-25015Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-652 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Data within XQuery Expressions ('XQuery Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Data within XQuery Expressions ('XQuery Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.