LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-23802: WordPress HT Easy GA4 ( Google Analytics 4 ) Plugin <= 1.0.6 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HasThemes HT Easy GA4 ( Google Analytics 4 ) plugin <= 1.0.6 versions.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2023-23802 is a CSRF issue in the HasThemes HT Easy GA4 WordPress plugin, reported for versions up to 1.0.6. It may let an attacker cause an already signed-in WordPress user to make unintended plugin-related changes. The documented impact is limited to integrity, not data theft or service outage.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted website integrity risk, not an emergency outage or data breach signal. Prioritize quick inventory and vendor-guided update or removal on public WordPress properties, especially sites with many administrators or weak admin-session hygiene.

Technical view

The source describes CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery in ht-easy-google-analytics, with CVSS 3.1 score 4.3 and vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N. Evidence indicates network reachability and required user interaction, with low integrity impact only. No exploit procedure or concrete fixed version is provided in the bundle.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to WordPress sites running HasThemes HT Easy GA4 up to version 1.0.6. Sites without this plugin, or with unaffected versions, are not indicated as exposed by the supplied sources.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not report active exploitation, and KEV status is false. CSRF generally depends on a targeted user interaction while the victim has an active authenticated session. The available sources do not describe public exploit use, exploitation volume, or specific abuse outcomes.

Researcher notes

The source bundle is sparse. It gives the vulnerability type, affected plugin name, affected upper version, CVSS vector, CWE, and Patchstack reference, but not a named vulnerable endpoint, proof details, patch version, or confirmed exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the ht-easy-google-analytics plugin.
  • Identify any active installations at version 1.0.6 or earlier.
  • Check HasThemes, WordPress plugin, or Patchstack guidance for the corrected release.
  • Update, disable, or remove the plugin according to vendor guidance.
  • Review recent plugin configuration changes for unexpected modifications.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether HT Easy GA4 is installed and active on each WordPress site.
  • Record the installed plugin version and compare it with the affected range.
  • Verify vendor or Patchstack advisory status before declaring remediation complete.
  • Review WordPress admin logs for relevant unexpected setting changes.
  • Document sites where the plugin is absent or already outside the affected range.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-23802 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-23802Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
HasThemesHT Easy GA4 ( Google Analytics 4 )ht-easy-google-analytics, n/aunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.