LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-2376: Ubiquiti EdgeRouter X Web Management command injection

A security vulnerability has been detected in Ubiquiti EdgeRouter X up to 2.0.9-hotfix.6. The affected element is an unknown function of the component Web Management Interface. The manipulation of the argument dpi leads to command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. There are still doubts about whether this vulnerability truly exists. The vendor position is that post-authentication issues are not accepted as vulnerabilities.

HighCVSS 8.6Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2023-2376 is a reported command injection issue in the Ubiquiti EdgeRouter X web management interface. It requires a highly privileged authenticated user, but could allow serious device compromise if valid admin access is abused. The report is disputed: the vendor reportedly does not accept post-authentication issues as vulnerabilities, and sources note doubts about whether it truly exists.

Executive priority

Prioritize review for EdgeRouter X devices exposed beyond trusted admin networks. The business concern is perimeter device compromise after admin credential misuse. Urgency is reduced by the high-privilege requirement and dispute status, but routers are high-impact assets and should be hardened promptly.

Technical view

The report affects Ubiquiti EdgeRouter X versions up to 2.0.9-hotfix.6. The claimed flaw is command injection through the web management interface’s dpi argument, mapped to CWE-74 and CWE-77. CVSS v4 is 8.6 with network attack vector, low complexity, high privileges required, and high impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant where EdgeRouter X web management is reachable by administrators, especially from untrusted networks. Risk depends heavily on privileged credential control. The sources do not identify unauthenticated exposure, and the CVSS vector indicates high privileges are required.

Exploitation context

VulDB states the exploit was publicly disclosed and may be used. The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Treat public disclosure as a risk signal, but do not assume in-the-wild exploitation from the available evidence.

Researcher notes

Evidence is mainly from VulDB and CVE records. The issue is described as post-authentication command injection in a dpi argument, but sources explicitly note doubts and a vendor position rejecting post-authentication reports. No source in the bundle names a patch or vendor advisory fix.

Mitigation direction

  • Check Ubiquiti guidance for affected EdgeRouter X firmware and any recommended updates.
  • Restrict web management access to trusted administrative networks only.
  • Remove internet exposure for the management interface where possible.
  • Review and limit privileged administrator accounts.
  • Rotate credentials if unauthorized administrative access is suspected.
  • Monitor device logs for suspicious web management or DPI-related configuration activity.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory EdgeRouter X devices and firmware versions.
  • Confirm whether versions are 2.0.9-hotfix.0 through 2.0.9-hotfix.6.
  • Verify web management exposure from internal, VPN, and internet paths.
  • Review privileged account usage and recent administrative sessions.
  • Check logs for unexpected DPI or web management configuration changes.
  • Track vendor and CVE updates because the report is disputed.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
7

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-74: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-77: Command execution behavior lookup

Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-2376 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.6 (4.0)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

4CVSS vectors
7Timeline events
1ADP providers
8Source links

CVSS vector scores

4 official scores

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.6CVSS 4.0HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:PVulDB
8.3CVSS 2.0HighAV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C/E:POC/RL:ND/RC:UR6.410VulDB
7.2CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R1.25.9VulDB
7.2CVSS 3.0HighCVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H/E:P/RL:X/RC:R1.25.9VulDB

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 4.0 score

8.6High
CVSS 4.0 vector shape for CVE-2023-2376Attack VectorAttack ComplexityAttack RequirementsPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionVS ConfidentialityVS IntegrityVS AvailabilitySS ConfidentialitySS IntegritySS Availability

Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Attack Requirements
NonePresent
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NonePassiveActive
VS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
VS Integrity
HighLowNone
VS Availability
HighLowNone
SS Confidentiality
HighLowNone
SS Integrity
HighLowNone
SS Availability
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. Source timelineVulDB

    Advisory disclosed

  2. Source timelineVulDB

    CVE reserved

  3. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry created

  4. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  5. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  6. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

  7. Source timelineVulDB

    VulDB entry last update

ADP provider summaries

CVECVE Program Container

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
UbiquitiEdgeRouter X2.0.9-hotfix.0, 2.0.9-hotfix.1, 2.0.9-hotfix.2, 2.0.9-hotfix.3, 2.0.9-hotfix.4, 2.0.9-hotfix.5, 2.0.9-hotfix.6Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-74 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-77 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection')

Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in a Command ('Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.