LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-23078: Cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Zoho ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus 14 via the comment field whe...

Cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Zoho ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus 14 via the comment field when changing the credentials in the Assets.

MediumCVSS 6.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2023-23078 is a cross-site scripting issue in Zoho ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus 14. A crafted comment in the Assets credential-change workflow could run script in another user's browser if they view it. Business impact is mainly session/user data exposure and unauthorized interface actions, not server takeover.

Executive priority

Treat as a medium-priority remediation unless the system is internet-facing or used by highly privileged support teams. Prioritize confirming build exposure and applying ManageEngine guidance, because compromise could affect trusted helpdesk sessions and asset-management workflows.

Technical view

The CVE describes CWE-79 XSS through the comment field when changing credentials in Assets. CVSS 3.1 is 6.1: network reachable, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, changed scope, low confidentiality and integrity impact, no availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where ManageEngine ServiceDesk Plus 14 is deployed and users interact with Assets credential-change comments. The source bundle does not enumerate exact affected builds, deployment modes, or prerequisite account conditions beyond the CVSS vector.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited active exploitation. The attack requires a victim to interact with affected UI content. Risk increases if ServiceDesk Plus is internet-accessible or used by privileged helpdesk, asset, or credential-management staff.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE description, CVSS vector, CWE-79 classification, and vendor/reference URLs. No exploit details, fixed version, or active exploitation evidence is present in the supplied bundle. Avoid assuming affected versions beyond ServiceDesk Plus 14.

Mitigation direction

  • Check the ManageEngine advisory for affected and fixed builds.
  • Apply the vendor-recommended update or mitigation when identified.
  • Limit ServiceDesk Plus exposure to trusted networks where feasible.
  • Restrict Assets credential workflow access to trusted roles.
  • Monitor comments and audit logs for suspicious stored content.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory all ServiceDesk Plus deployments and record exact builds.
  • Compare installed builds with the ManageEngine CVE advisory.
  • Review whether Assets credential-change comments are enabled or used.
  • Check audit logs for unusual comment creation or credential-change events.
  • Confirm vendor remediation status through change records.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-23078 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.1CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.82.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.1Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-23078Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.