LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2023-22935: SPL Command Safeguards Bypass via the ‘display.page.search.patterns.sensitivity’ Search Parameter in Splunk Enterprise

In Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.1.13, 8.2.10, and 9.0.4, the ‘display.page.search.patterns.sensitivity’ search parameter lets a search bypass SPL safeguards for risky commands. The vulnerability requires a higher privileged user to initiate a request within their browser and only affects instances with Splunk Web enabled.

HighCVSS 8.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This vulnerability lets a browser-based Splunk search request bypass safeguards around risky SPL commands. It matters because successful abuse could expose or alter data in Splunk. The sources say it requires a higher-privileged user to initiate a request in their browser and only affects deployments with Splunk Web enabled.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for internet-accessible or broadly reachable Splunk Web deployments, especially where privileged users regularly use the console. The issue is high severity because Splunk often centralizes sensitive operational and security data.

Technical view

CVE-2023-22935 is a CWE-20 input validation issue in Splunk Enterprise below 8.1.13, 8.2.10, and 9.0.4. The display.page.search.patterns.sensitivity search parameter can bypass SPL safeguards for risky commands. CVSS is 8.1 with high confidentiality and integrity impact, no availability impact, and user interaction required.

Likely exposure

Primary exposure is Splunk Enterprise 8.1, 8.2, or 9.0 deployments below the fixed releases with Splunk Web enabled. The source bundle also lists Splunk Cloud Platform, but provides no version detail; validate Cloud exposure through Splunk guidance.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not cite active exploitation, and CISA KEV status is false. Abuse requires a higher-privileged user to initiate a request in their browser, which makes phishing or browser-based request manipulation a plausible context, but the sources do not provide exploit evidence.

Researcher notes

Key constraints are important: Splunk Web must be enabled, user interaction is required, and the initiating browser belongs to a higher-privileged user. The public bundle does not establish active exploitation or provide detailed Splunk Cloud version impact.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Splunk Enterprise to 8.1.13, 8.2.10, 9.0.4, or later.
  • Check Splunk advisory SVD-2023-0205 for product-specific guidance.
  • Limit Splunk Web access to trusted users and networks.
  • Review privileged Splunk user exposure to browser-based attack paths.
  • For Splunk Cloud Platform, confirm remediation status with Splunk guidance.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Splunk Enterprise versions across all environments.
  • Confirm whether Splunk Web is enabled on each instance.
  • Compare versions against 8.1.13, 8.2.10, and 9.0.4 thresholds.
  • Review search activity for unexpected use of the named parameter.
  • Confirm Splunk Cloud Platform status with Splunk support or advisory data.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2023-22935 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N2.85.2Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2023-22935Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SplunkSplunk Enterprise8.1, 8.2, 9.0Listed
SplunkSplunk Cloud Platform-Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.