CVE-2023-1725: SSRF in Infoline Project Management System
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Infoline Project Management System allows Server Side Request Forgery.
This issue affects Project Management System: before 4.09.31.125.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2023-1725 is a critical SSRF flaw in Infoline Project Management System before 4.09.31.125. An unauthenticated remote attacker may be able to make the server send unintended requests, potentially exposing internal systems or disrupting service.
Executive priority
Treat this as urgent for any internet-facing Infoline deployment. Confirm exposure quickly, prioritize upgrade or isolation, and track remediation to closure because the published severity indicates possible high business impact.
Technical view
The record identifies CWE-918 SSRF with CVSS 3.1 score 9.8: network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, no user interaction, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. The public data does not describe the vulnerable endpoint, request shape, or confirmed patch notes.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to organizations running Infoline Project Management System versions before 4.09.31.125. Internet-facing instances carry the clearest business risk. The source bundle provides no CPEs and sparse version metadata, so asset confirmation is necessary.
Exploitation context
The CVE is not listed as KEV in the supplied data, and no cited source states active exploitation. The risk remains serious because the CVSS vector indicates unauthenticated remote exploitation with high impact if a vulnerable deployment is reachable.
Researcher notes
The public record is thin: it names SSRF, affected versions before 4.09.31.125, and critical CVSS, but omits technical details, exploit status, and explicit mitigation text. One referenced government URL is marked broken in the source bundle.
Mitigation direction
Inventory all Infoline Project Management System deployments and record exact versions.
Upgrade to 4.09.31.125 or later if vendor guidance confirms this as fixed.
Restrict public access to the application where business requirements allow.
Apply outbound egress filtering from application servers to internal metadata and management networks.
Monitor vendor and government advisories for updated remediation details.
Validation and detection
Confirm whether any deployed version is earlier than 4.09.31.125.
Verify exposed routes are not publicly reachable unless required.
Review application and proxy logs for unusual server-side outbound request patterns.
Check firewall logs for unexpected outbound traffic from application hosts.
Document compensating controls if immediate upgrade is not possible.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · medium confidence lookup
CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup
Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
2ADP providers
3Source links
SSVC decision data
CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: yesTechnical Impact: total
CVSS vector scores
1 official score
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-918 · source CWE mapping
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.