Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
OrangeScrum 2.0.11 can reflect attacker-controlled input as HTML, creating a cross-site scripting risk. A victim must interact with malicious content, but the attacker does not need an account. Successful exploitation could expose user account information or allow limited actions in the victim’s browser context.
Executive priority
Treat this as a medium-priority web application issue. It is not confirmed as actively exploited, but internet-facing OrangeScrum 2.0.11 systems should be remediated promptly because account exposure is possible after user interaction.
Technical view
CVE-2023-0624 is a CWE-79 issue in OrangeScrum 2.0.11. The application returns malicious user input in a response served as text/html. CVSS 3.1 is 6.1 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges required, user interaction required, changed scope, and low confidentiality and integrity impact.
Likely exposure
Exposure is limited to organizations running OrangeScrum version 2.0.11, especially if the application is internet-facing or reachable by untrusted users. The source bundle does not identify other affected versions or products.
Exploitation context
The CVE is not listed in KEV, and the provided sources do not claim active exploitation. Exploitation requires user interaction, consistent with reflected cross-site scripting rather than automatic compromise.
Researcher notes
The record describes reflected input returned as HTML and maps to CWE-79. Evidence is incomplete on exact endpoints, patch version, and vendor remediation status, so avoid broad version claims beyond OrangeScrum 2.0.11.
Mitigation direction
- Identify any OrangeScrum 2.0.11 deployments in production, staging, and exposed test environments.
- Check OrangeScrum and Fluid Attacks guidance for an official fix or vendor-approved workaround.
- Reduce untrusted access to exposed OrangeScrum instances until remediation is confirmed.
- Validate that reflected user input is encoded and not returned as executable HTML.
- Use monitoring controls to detect suspicious reflected-script attempts against OrangeScrum endpoints.
Validation and detection
- Confirm deployed OrangeScrum versions through asset inventory or application administration records.
- Review affected responses for reflected user input served with text/html content type.
- Check application, proxy, and WAF logs for suspicious input targeting OrangeScrum pages.
- Verify remediation with regression tests covering reflected input and response content handling.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2023-0624 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Medium
- CVSS
- 6.1 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.82.7Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
6.1MediumVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://github.com/Orangescrum/orangescrum/CVE reference
- https://fluidattacks.com/advisories/oberhofer/CVE reference
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.