Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Tdarr 2.00.15 has a critical flaw that can let an unauthenticated remote attacker run commands on the host through the Help terminal. If Tdarr is reachable from untrusted networks, the business impact could include server takeover, data exposure, service disruption, or lateral movement.
Executive priority
Treat as an immediate priority for any exposed Tdarr 2.00.15 system. The issue is unauthenticated remote code execution with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. If Tdarr is internal-only and tightly restricted, urgency remains high but exposure-driven.
Technical view
CVE-2022-50919 is a CWE-78 command injection in Tdarr 2.00.15. The CVSS 3.1 score is 9.8, with network access, low complexity, no privileges, and no user interaction required. Public references include a VulnCheck advisory and ExploitDB entry.
Likely exposure
Highest exposure is Tdarr 2.00.15 instances reachable from the internet or shared internal networks. The source bundle identifies only version 2.00.15 as affected. No CPEs or broader version ranges were provided.
Exploitation context
A public ExploitDB entry exists, so exploitation knowledge is publicly available. The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation in the wild. Treat exposed instances as urgent because exploitation requires no authentication per the CVE description.
Researcher notes
Evidence is strong for the affected version, vulnerability class, and public exploit availability. Evidence is incomplete for official vendor fixes, affected version ranges beyond 2.00.15, and active exploitation. Do not assume KEV status; the bundle states KEV is false.
Mitigation direction
- Identify all Tdarr deployments and confirm whether version 2.00.15 is present.
- Remove Tdarr from direct internet exposure where possible.
- Restrict access to trusted networks, VPNs, or authenticated administrative paths.
- Check Tdarr vendor guidance for fixed versions or official mitigation instructions.
- Prioritize replacement or upgrade if a vendor-confirmed fixed release is available.
- Monitor hosts for suspicious child processes or unexpected outbound connections.
Validation and detection
- Inventory Tdarr versions across servers, containers, and media automation hosts.
- Check external attack surface records for exposed Tdarr services.
- Review access logs for unusual Help terminal activity where available.
- Review endpoint telemetry for unexpected command execution by Tdarr processes.
- Confirm compensating controls block unauthenticated access from untrusted networks.
- Document whether a vendor-supported remediation has been applied.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-78: Command execution behavior lookup
Command injection weaknesses can lead defenders to review execution techniques and command interpreter telemetry. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupExecution behavior lookup
The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2022-50919 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Critical
- CVSS
- 9.8 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H3.95.9Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
9.8CriticalVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- ExploitDB-50822CVE reference · exploit
- Official Vendor HomepageCVE reference · product
- VulnCheck Advisory: Tdarr 2.00.15 - Command InjectionCVE reference · third-party-advisory
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection')
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.