LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-50743: erofs: Fix pcluster memleak when its block address is zero

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: erofs: Fix pcluster memleak when its block address is zero syzkaller reported a memleak: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=62f37ff612f0021641eda5b17f056f1668aa9aed unreferenced object 0xffff88811009c7f8 (size 136): ... backtrace: [<ffffffff821db19b>] z_erofs_do_read_page+0x99b/0x1740 [<ffffffff821dee9e>] z_erofs_readahead+0x24e/0x580 [<ffffffff814bc0d6>] read_pages+0x86/0x3d0 ... syzkaller constructed a case: in z_erofs_register_pcluster(), ztailpacking = false and map->m_pa = zero. This makes pcl->obj.index be zero although pcl is not a inline pcluster. Then following path adds refcount for grp, but the refcount won't be put because pcl is inline. z_erofs_readahead() z_erofs_do_read_page() # for another page z_erofs_collector_begin() erofs_find_workgroup() erofs_workgroup_get() Since it's illegal for the block address of a non-inlined pcluster to be zero, add check here to avoid registering the pcluster which would be leaked.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-50743 is a Linux kernel EROFS filesystem memory leak. A crafted or invalid EROFS condition can cause kernel memory not to be released during read-ahead handling. Business impact is mainly availability risk on systems that mount EROFS images, especially untrusted ones. No public source provided indicates active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a targeted availability issue, not an emergency internet-wide compromise based on current evidence. Prioritize patching for systems that ingest or mount EROFS images from less-trusted sources, and include it in normal kernel update cycles elsewhere.

Technical view

The flaw is in Linux EROFS compressed data handling. syzkaller found that a non-inline pcluster with block address zero could be registered, causing a workgroup reference count imbalance and leaked object. Kernel stable commits add a check to avoid registering such invalid pclusters.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most relevant where Linux systems mount EROFS filesystems or images. Risk is higher if images can come from users, build pipelines, containers, appliances, mobile/embedded workflows, or removable media. Systems not using EROFS have limited practical exposure based on the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The available sources describe a syzkaller-discovered memory leak and kernel fix. They do not provide evidence of active exploitation, public weaponization, or remote exploitability. Practical abuse would likely require the ability to provide or trigger processing of a malformed EROFS filesystem image.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE description, syzkaller report reference, and Linux stable commits. No CVSS, CWE, or KEV listing is provided. The affected-version data in the bundle is sparse, so validation should rely on vendor kernel advisories and commit backport status.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply Linux vendor kernel updates that include the referenced stable EROFS fixes.
  • If patching is delayed, avoid mounting untrusted EROFS images.
  • Check distribution advisories for affected package versions and backports.
  • Limit who can introduce filesystem images into production workflows.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Linux systems using or supporting EROFS mounts.
  • Review kernel package changelogs for the referenced EROFS fix commits.
  • Confirm vendor advisories map your kernel build to a fixed version.
  • Prioritize systems processing untrusted filesystem images.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-50743 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
4Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
LinuxLinuxcecf864d3d76d50e3d9c58145e286a0b8c284e92, cecf864d3d76d50e3d9c58145e286a0b8c284e92, cecf864d3d76d50e3d9c58145e286a0b8c284e92unaffected
LinuxLinux5.17, 0, 6.0.16, 6.1.2, 6.2affected
Weakness

CWE details

No CWE listed

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.