In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
RDMA/siw: Fix duplicated reported IW_CM_EVENT_CONNECT_REPLY event
If siw_recv_mpa_rr returns -EAGAIN, it means that the MPA reply hasn't
been received completely, and should not report IW_CM_EVENT_CONNECT_REPLY
in this case. This may trigger a call trace in iw_cm. A simple way to
trigger this:
server: ib_send_lat
client: ib_send_lat -R <server_ip>
The call trace looks like this:
kernel BUG at drivers/infiniband/core/iwcm.c:894!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
<...>
Workqueue: iw_cm_wq cm_work_handler [iw_cm]
Call Trace:
<TASK>
cm_work_handler+0x1dd/0x370 [iw_cm]
process_one_work+0x1e2/0x3b0
worker_thread+0x49/0x2e0
? rescuer_thread+0x370/0x370
kthread+0xe5/0x110
? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
</TASK>
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
CVE-2022-50136 is a Linux kernel RDMA/siw bug that can trigger a kernel BUG and call trace during connection handling. The disclosed impact is system instability, not data theft. Organizations using Linux RDMA SoftiWARP should prioritize kernel updates through their vendor or stable kernel source.
Executive priority
Treat as a targeted infrastructure stability issue. It is not currently supported as actively exploited, but affected RDMA/siw systems could crash or become unstable. Patch during the next appropriate maintenance window, faster for production RDMA workloads.
Technical view
The flaw is in Linux RDMA/siw handling of MPA replies. When siw_recv_mpa_rr returns -EAGAIN, an incomplete reply could still report IW_CM_EVENT_CONNECT_REPLY, causing duplicated event handling and a BUG in drivers/infiniband/core/iwcm.c. Stable kernel commits address the incorrect event reporting.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most relevant to Linux systems using RDMA/siw. The CVE record lists affected Linux versions including 5.3, 5.4.211, 5.10.137, 5.15.61, 5.18.18, 5.19.2, and 6.0. Systems without RDMA/siw use are less likely to be exposed.
Exploitation context
The source describes a simple reproducer using RDMA latency tooling between a server and client. No CISA KEV listing or cited source indicates active exploitation. The demonstrated outcome is a kernel BUG/call trace, suggesting denial-of-service or stability risk in exposed RDMA/siw environments.
Researcher notes
The record lacks CVSS, CWE, and detailed impact scoring. The affected-version data is kernel-centric and should be reconciled with distribution backports. Analysis should focus on RDMA/siw reachability, module use, and whether the referenced stable commits are present.
Mitigation direction
Update affected Linux kernels to a vendor or stable release containing the referenced fixes.
Prioritize systems where RDMA/siw is enabled or used in production.
If patch timing is constrained, check vendor guidance for safe temporary exposure reduction.
Monitor vendor advisories for backported fixes in distribution kernels.
Validation and detection
Inventory Linux kernel versions across RDMA-capable hosts.
Confirm whether RDMA/siw is enabled or used.
Compare installed kernels against vendor fixed builds or referenced stable commits.
Review kernel logs for iw_cm BUG or RDMA/siw connection-related call traces.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cve · low confidence lookup
CVE-2022-50136 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
0CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
0ADP providers
7Source links
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
Jun 18, 2025, 11:03 UTC (UTC+00:00)
CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.