LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-49536: scsi: lpfc: Fix SCSI I/O completion and abort handler deadlock

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: lpfc: Fix SCSI I/O completion and abort handler deadlock During stress I/O tests with 500+ vports, hard LOCKUP call traces are observed. CPU A: native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x192 _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x32 lpfc_handle_fcp_err+0x4c6 lpfc_fcp_io_cmd_wqe_cmpl+0x964 lpfc_sli4_fp_handle_cqe+0x266 __lpfc_sli4_process_cq+0x105 __lpfc_sli4_hba_process_cq+0x3c lpfc_cq_poll_hdler+0x16 irq_poll_softirq+0x76 __softirqentry_text_start+0xe4 irq_exit+0xf7 do_IRQ+0x7f CPU B: native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x5b _raw_spin_lock+0x1c lpfc_abort_handler+0x13e scmd_eh_abort_handler+0x85 process_one_work+0x1a7 worker_thread+0x30 kthread+0x112 ret_from_fork+0x1f Diagram of lockup: CPUA CPUB ---- ---- lpfc_cmd->buf_lock phba->hbalock lpfc_cmd->buf_lock phba->hbalock Fix by reordering the taking of the lpfc_cmd->buf_lock and phba->hbalock in lpfc_abort_handler routine so that it tries to take the lpfc_cmd->buf_lock first before phba->hbalock.

MediumCVSS 5.5Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This is a Linux kernel availability issue in the lpfc Fibre Channel SCSI driver. Under heavy storage stress, lock ordering can deadlock kernel paths handling SCSI I/O completion and aborts, causing hard lockups. It does not affect confidentiality or integrity in the provided scoring.

Executive priority

Handle as a moderate-priority infrastructure stability fix. It is not described as remotely exploitable or data-stealing, but affected storage servers could hard-lock under demanding conditions. Patch during the next suitable maintenance window, sooner for critical Fibre Channel workloads.

Technical view

CVE-2022-49536 is a CWE-667 improper locking issue in lpfc. The fix reorders lpfc_cmd->buf_lock and phba->hbalock acquisition in lpfc_abort_handler to match completion handling and avoid a deadlock observed during stress I/O with 500+ vports.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on Linux systems using the lpfc driver for Fibre Channel storage, especially high-vport or heavy SCSI I/O environments. The CVSS vector indicates local attack surface and low privileges, but exact affected builds depend on kernel version and distributor backports.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show active exploitation, and KEV is false. Evidence describes stress-test lockups rather than public exploitation. Treat this primarily as a local availability and storage resiliency risk until vendor or distro advisories say otherwise.

Researcher notes

The affected-version data in the bundle is limited and somewhat range-like, so distro-specific exposure requires vendor mapping. The clearest technical evidence is the kernel commit description: a lock inversion between completion and abort handler paths in lpfc under stress.

Mitigation direction

  • Apply a vendor kernel update containing the referenced lpfc stable fixes.
  • Prioritize systems using lpfc with high vport counts or heavy storage I/O.
  • Check Linux distribution advisories for fixed backported kernel builds.
  • Schedule reboots where required for the patched kernel to take effect.
  • Monitor affected hosts for hard lockups until remediation is complete.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Linux hosts using the lpfc Fibre Channel driver.
  • Compare running kernels against vendor fixed versions or referenced stable commits.
  • Review kernel logs for lpfc, SCSI abort, or hard LOCKUP traces.
  • Confirm the patched kernel is active after maintenance reboot.
  • Regression test storage I/O and abort handling in staging where practical.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-667: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-49536 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.5 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
3Timeline events
1ADP providers
5Source links

SSVC decision data

CISA-ADPCISA Coordinator
Timestamp
Version
2.0.3
Exploitation: noneAutomatable: noTechnical Impact: partial

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.5CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H1.83.6CISA-ADP

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.5Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-49536Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Vulnerability timeline

Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.

  1. CVE reservedCVE Program

    The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.

  2. CVE publishedCVE Program

    The CVE record was published.

  3. CVE updatedCVE Program

    The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.

ADP provider summaries

CISA-ADPCISA ADP Vulnrichment
cvssV3_1other:ssvc
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
LinuxLinuxc2017260eea2db62e7bb1b7cbb1759f1d11ed067, c2017260eea2db62e7bb1b7cbb1759f1d11ed067, c2017260eea2db62e7bb1b7cbb1759f1d11ed067, c2017260eea2db62e7bb1b7cbb1759f1d11ed067unaffected
LinuxLinux5.1, 0, 5.15.46, 5.17.14, 5.18.3, 5.19affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-667 · source CWE mapping

Improper Locking

Improper Locking represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.