In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
scsi: lpfc: Fix SCSI I/O completion and abort handler deadlock
During stress I/O tests with 500+ vports, hard LOCKUP call traces are
observed.
CPU A:
native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x192
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x32
lpfc_handle_fcp_err+0x4c6
lpfc_fcp_io_cmd_wqe_cmpl+0x964
lpfc_sli4_fp_handle_cqe+0x266
__lpfc_sli4_process_cq+0x105
__lpfc_sli4_hba_process_cq+0x3c
lpfc_cq_poll_hdler+0x16
irq_poll_softirq+0x76
__softirqentry_text_start+0xe4
irq_exit+0xf7
do_IRQ+0x7f
CPU B:
native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x5b
_raw_spin_lock+0x1c
lpfc_abort_handler+0x13e
scmd_eh_abort_handler+0x85
process_one_work+0x1a7
worker_thread+0x30
kthread+0x112
ret_from_fork+0x1f
Diagram of lockup:
CPUA CPUB
---- ----
lpfc_cmd->buf_lock
phba->hbalock
lpfc_cmd->buf_lock
phba->hbalock
Fix by reordering the taking of the lpfc_cmd->buf_lock and phba->hbalock in
lpfc_abort_handler routine so that it tries to take the lpfc_cmd->buf_lock
first before phba->hbalock.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This is a Linux kernel availability issue in the lpfc Fibre Channel SCSI driver. Under heavy storage stress, lock ordering can deadlock kernel paths handling SCSI I/O completion and aborts, causing hard lockups. It does not affect confidentiality or integrity in the provided scoring.
Executive priority
Handle as a moderate-priority infrastructure stability fix. It is not described as remotely exploitable or data-stealing, but affected storage servers could hard-lock under demanding conditions. Patch during the next suitable maintenance window, sooner for critical Fibre Channel workloads.
Technical view
CVE-2022-49536 is a CWE-667 improper locking issue in lpfc. The fix reorders lpfc_cmd->buf_lock and phba->hbalock acquisition in lpfc_abort_handler to match completion handling and avoid a deadlock observed during stress I/O with 500+ vports.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely on Linux systems using the lpfc driver for Fibre Channel storage, especially high-vport or heavy SCSI I/O environments. The CVSS vector indicates local attack surface and low privileges, but exact affected builds depend on kernel version and distributor backports.
Exploitation context
The source bundle does not show active exploitation, and KEV is false. Evidence describes stress-test lockups rather than public exploitation. Treat this primarily as a local availability and storage resiliency risk until vendor or distro advisories say otherwise.
Researcher notes
The affected-version data in the bundle is limited and somewhat range-like, so distro-specific exposure requires vendor mapping. The clearest technical evidence is the kernel commit description: a lock inversion between completion and abort handler paths in lpfc under stress.
Mitigation direction
Apply a vendor kernel update containing the referenced lpfc stable fixes.
Prioritize systems using lpfc with high vport counts or heavy storage I/O.
Check Linux distribution advisories for fixed backported kernel builds.
Schedule reboots where required for the patched kernel to take effect.
Monitor affected hosts for hard lockups until remediation is complete.
Validation and detection
Inventory Linux hosts using the lpfc Fibre Channel driver.
Compare running kernels against vendor fixed versions or referenced stable commits.
Review kernel logs for lpfc, SCSI abort, or hard LOCKUP traces.
Confirm the patched kernel is active after maintenance reboot.
Regression test storage I/O and abort handling in staging where practical.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cwe · low confidence lookup
CWE-667: Exact CWE lookup
Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
CWE-667 · source CWE mapping
Improper Locking
Improper Locking represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.