CVE-2022-48939: bpf: Add schedule points in batch ops
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
bpf: Add schedule points in batch ops
syzbot reported various soft lockups caused by bpf batch operations.
INFO: task kworker/1:1:27 blocked for more than 140 seconds.
INFO: task hung in rcu_barrier
Nothing prevents batch ops to process huge amount of data,
we need to add schedule points in them.
Note that maybe_wait_bpf_programs(map) calls from
generic_map_delete_batch() can be factorized by moving
the call after the loop.
This will be done later in -next tree once we get this fix merged,
unless there is strong opinion doing this optimization sooner.
Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This Linux kernel issue can let BPF batch operations monopolize CPU long enough to trigger soft lockups or hung tasks. The practical business risk is service instability or denial of service on affected Linux systems. The sources do not provide CVSS, confirmed exploitation, or a broader impact claim.
Executive priority
Treat this as a reliability and availability patch, not an emergency internet-facing compromise based on current evidence. Schedule remediation through normal kernel maintenance, with higher urgency for shared or multi-tenant Linux infrastructure.
Technical view
The resolved kernel change adds scheduler yield points inside BPF map batch operations because nothing limited processing of very large batches. syzbot reported soft lockups and tasks blocked in rcu_barrier. The fix is represented by Linux stable commits referenced for affected kernel lines.
Likely exposure
Exposure is most likely on Linux hosts running affected kernel versions or unfixed downstream builds where BPF batch operations are available. The source bundle does not establish remote exposure or affected distributions.
Exploitation context
No active exploitation is supported by the provided sources. KEV is false, and the evidence describes syzbot-discovered soft lockups rather than public exploitation or weaponized use.
Researcher notes
The source bundle lacks CVSS, CWE, exploit prerequisites, and distribution-specific fixed package data. Analysis should stay tied to the Linux stable commits and syzbot soft-lockup behavior until vendor advisories add more detail.
Mitigation direction
Upgrade to a Linux kernel containing the referenced stable fixes.
Use distribution vendor packages when available for your kernel line.
If patching is delayed, review vendor guidance for limiting BPF availability.
Prioritize systems where workload isolation depends on kernel availability.
Validation and detection
Inventory Linux kernel versions across servers and container hosts.
Map running kernels against vendor advisories and referenced stable commits.
Check whether BPF functionality is available on exposed multi-tenant systems.
Review kernel logs for soft lockups, hung tasks, or rcu_barrier stalls.
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Potential ATT&CK relevance
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
cve · low confidence lookup
CVE-2022-48939 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.