Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
Softr v2.0 reportedly allowed HTML injection through the workspace name field. A user with access could store markup that may be rendered to another user. This is not listed in CISA KEV, and the provided sources do not confirm active exploitation or a fixed version.
Executive priority
Treat this as a moderate web application risk. Prioritize confirmation if Softr is used for business workflows, customer portals, or admin-facing operations. Escalate only if untrusted users can modify workspace names or suspicious content is found.
Technical view
CVE-2022-48085 is mapped to CWE-79 with CVSS 3.1 score 5.4. The vector indicates network access, low attack complexity, low privileges required, user interaction required, changed scope, low confidentiality and integrity impact, and no availability impact. The only named input is the Work Space Name parameter.
Likely exposure
Exposure appears limited to Softr v2.0 deployments or accounts where untrusted users can create or rename workspaces. The source bundle lists affected vendor, product, versions, and CPEs as n/a, so asset-specific exposure requires local inventory and vendor confirmation.
Exploitation context
The bundle supports HTML injection, not confirmed exploitation in the wild. Because privileges and user interaction are required, risk is highest where many users manage Softr workspaces or where workspace names are viewed by administrators or other trusted users.
Researcher notes
The public record is sparse: affected product metadata is n/a, no patch is named, and the Medium reference appears to be the main technical reference. Avoid assuming broader Softr platform impact beyond v2.0 and the Work Space Name parameter.
Mitigation direction
- Check Softr vendor guidance for patched versions or platform-side fixes.
- Upgrade or migrate if Softr identifies a fixed release or mitigation.
- Restrict workspace creation and rename permissions to trusted users.
- Review workspace names for unexpected HTML or script-like content.
- Ensure displayed workspace names are encoded, not rendered as markup.
Validation and detection
- Inventory Softr usage and determine whether v2.0 is present.
- Identify who can create or rename Softr workspaces.
- Review current workspace names for suspicious markup.
- Confirm workspace names render as text in relevant views.
- Check vendor advisories or support channels for remediation status.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2022-48085 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Medium
- CVSS
- 5.4 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
SSVC decision data
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.32.7CISA-ADPVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
5.4MediumVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Vulnerability timeline
Timeline events are normalized from CVE metadata, CNA source timelines, ADP timelines, and KEV metadata when present.
- CVE reservedCVE Program
The CVE ID was reserved by the assigning CNA.
- CVE publishedCVE Program
The CVE record was published.
- CVE updatedCVE Program
The CVE record metadata indicates this as the latest update time.
ADP provider summaries
Source materials
- CVE List V5 sourceCVE List V5
- https://www.softr.io/CVE reference, mitre
- https://studio.softr.io/dashboardCVE reference, mitre
- https://isaghojaria.medium.com/softr-v2-0-was-discovered-to-contain-a-html-injection-vulnerability-via-the-work-space-name-d0152e1cff51CVE reference, mitre
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.