LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-47163: WordPress WP CSV to Database Plugin <= 2.6 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Tips and Tricks HQ, josh401 WP CSV to Database – Insert CSV file content into WordPress plugin <= 2.6 versions.

LowCVSS 3.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysislow

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-47163 is a low-severity CSRF issue in the WordPress WP CSV to Database plugin through version 2.6. A successful attack would require user interaction and could cause a limited unauthorized change, not data theft or service outage based on the provided CVSS data.

Executive priority

Treat this as routine vulnerability management unless the plugin supports sensitive operational workflows. The reported impact is limited integrity change, with no sourced evidence of data exposure, outage, or active exploitation.

Technical view

The issue is CWE-352 Cross-Site Request Forgery in wp-csv-to-database, affecting versions <= 2.6. The CVSS 3.1 vector is AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N, indicating network reachability, high attack complexity, required user interaction, and low integrity impact only.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running WP CSV to Database version 2.6 or earlier. Sites without this plugin, or with unaffected versions, are not indicated as exposed in the bundle.

Exploitation context

The bundle does not report active exploitation, and CISA KEV status is false. Exploitation would require tricking a user into taking an action that triggers a forged request.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse beyond the CVE metadata and Patchstack entry. The affected operation, required victim role, nonce details, and fixed version are not specified in the provided bundle, so validation should avoid assumptions.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the wp-csv-to-database plugin.
  • Identify whether installed versions are 2.6 or earlier.
  • Check vendor or Patchstack guidance for fixed versions or mitigations.
  • Disable or remove the plugin where it is not required.
  • Prioritize normal patch-cycle remediation unless business context raises risk.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm the plugin slug and installed version on each WordPress site.
  • Review admin functionality exposed by the plugin for CSRF protections.
  • Check security tools or WordPress inventory for affected plugin deployments.
  • Look for vendor or Patchstack updates before production remediation.
  • Document whether the plugin is absent, updated, disabled, or still exposed.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-47163 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Low
CVSS
3.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
3.1CVSS 3.1LowCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N1.61.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

3.1Low
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-47163Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Tips and Tricks HQ, josh401WP CSV to Database – Insert CSV file content into WordPress databasewp-csv-to-database, n/aunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.