Security readout for executives and security teams
Plain-English summary
This affects the WordPress DH – Anti AdBlocker plugin version 36 and earlier. A malicious site could trick a logged-in WordPress user into making an unwanted plugin-related change. The known impact is limited integrity loss, not data theft or service outage.
Executive priority
Treat as a routine but real WordPress hygiene issue. Prioritize sites using this plugin, especially business-critical or externally managed WordPress properties, but this is not supported as an emergency exploitation event by the provided sources.
Technical view
The issue is a CSRF flaw, CWE-352, in Dannie Herdyawan DH – Anti AdBlocker. CVSS 3.1 is 4.3: network reachable, low complexity, no attacker privileges, user interaction required, unchanged scope, low integrity impact only.
Likely exposure
Exposure is likely limited to WordPress sites with the dh-anti-adblocker plugin installed at version 36 or earlier. The provided sources do not identify other affected products or platforms.
Exploitation context
The bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. Exploitation requires user interaction, likely involving a logged-in WordPress user visiting attacker-controlled content.
Researcher notes
Evidence is thin: the CVE record and Patchstack entry identify CSRF in plugin versions up to 36, but the bundle does not provide endpoint details, exploit proof, or a named fixed version. Avoid claiming compromise without site-specific evidence.
Mitigation direction
- Inventory WordPress sites for DH – Anti AdBlocker installations.
- Check vendor or Patchstack guidance for any fixed version or advisory update.
- Update the plugin if a trusted fixed release is available.
- Disable or remove the plugin where it is unnecessary.
- Restrict WordPress admin access to trusted users and hardened sessions.
Validation and detection
- Confirm whether dh-anti-adblocker is installed on each WordPress site.
- Record the installed plugin version and compare it with version 36 or earlier.
- Review plugin settings for unexpected changes made by authorized accounts.
- Verify remediation against current vendor or Patchstack guidance.
- Document residual risk if no fixed version is available.
Public sources used
Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.
Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context
These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.
ATT&CK lookup starting points
Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.
CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup
Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.
Open ATT&CK lookupCVE-2022-47162 mapping review
Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.
Open ATT&CK lookup- Severity
- Medium
- CVSS
- 4.3 (3.1)
- Known Exploited
- No
- Published
Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5
These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.
CVSS vector scores
1 official scoreWe collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE scoreVulnerability scoring details
Base CVSS 3.1 score
4.3MediumVector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Source materials
Products and packages named in the record
CWE details
CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.