LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-47154: WordPress CSS JS Manager Plugin <= 2.4.49 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Pi Websolution CSS JS Manager, Async JavaScript, Defer Render Blocking CSS supports WooCommerce plugin <= 2.4.49 versions.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

A WordPress plugin used to manage CSS/JavaScript loading for WooCommerce sites has a CSRF flaw in versions up to 2.4.49. An attacker could potentially trick a user into making unintended plugin changes. The published impact is limited to low integrity impact, with no confidentiality or availability impact stated.

Executive priority

Treat this as a medium-priority WordPress hygiene issue. It is not cited as actively exploited, but affected e-commerce sites should still be remediated because unintended plugin configuration changes could affect site behavior or business operations.

Technical view

CVE-2022-47154 is a CWE-352 CSRF issue in Pi Websolution CSS JS Manager, Async JavaScript, Defer Render Blocking CSS supports WooCommerce plugin <=2.4.49. CVSS 3.1 is 4.3: network reachable, low complexity, no attacker privileges, victim interaction required, unchanged scope, low integrity impact, and no confidentiality or availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running the affected Pi Websolution plugin at version 2.4.49 or earlier. The bundle provides no CPEs and lists package name css-js-manager, so asset discovery should use WordPress plugin inventory rather than relying only on vulnerability scanners.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not identify active exploitation, and KEV status is false. CSRF generally depends on victim interaction in an authenticated browser context, but the provided sources do not specify the exact affected action, role, or operational workflow.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse: Patchstack and CVE data identify the plugin, version ceiling, CWE, and CVSS, but not the vulnerable endpoint, fixed version, or proof of exploitation. Avoid assuming exploitability beyond CSRF with required victim interaction and low integrity impact.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the css-js-manager plugin.
  • Upgrade or remove affected plugin versions per vendor guidance.
  • Check Patchstack and vendor pages for fixed-version details.
  • Limit WordPress admin access to trusted users only.
  • Review recent plugin configuration changes for unexpected modifications.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether the plugin is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record installed plugin versions and flag <=2.4.49.
  • Verify remediation against vendor or Patchstack guidance.
  • Review security scans for CVE-2022-47154 findings.
  • Check change history for suspicious plugin setting updates.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-47154 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-47154Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Pi WebsolutionCSS JS Manager, Async JavaScript, Defer Render Blocking CSS supports WooCommercecss-js-manager, n/aunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.