LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-45835: WordPress PhonePe Payment Solutions Plugin <= 1.0.15 is vulnerable to Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in PhonePe PhonePe Payment Solutions.This issue affects PhonePe Payment Solutions: from n/a through 1.0.15.

MediumCVSS 5.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-45835 is an SSRF issue in the WordPress PhonePe Payment Solutions plugin through version 1.0.15. A remote unauthenticated attacker may be able to make the website server send unintended requests. Public evidence rates it medium severity, and the provided sources do not show confirmed active exploitation.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate ecommerce platform risk. It deserves prompt inventory and remediation planning, especially on payment-related WordPress sites, but the provided evidence does not support emergency response for active exploitation.

Technical view

The vulnerability is CWE-918 server-side request forgery in PhonePe Payment Solutions for WordPress, affecting versions through 1.0.15. CVSS 3.1 is 5.8: network exploitable, low complexity, no privileges or user interaction, changed scope, low confidentiality impact, and no integrity or availability impact stated.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running the PhonePe Payment Solutions plugin at version 1.0.15 or earlier. Internet-facing ecommerce sites using this plugin are the most relevant population. No other products are identified in the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not report CISA KEV listing or active exploitation. Risk comes from unauthenticated network reachability and SSRF behavior, which can sometimes expose internal metadata or services depending on hosting controls.

Researcher notes

The evidence identifies SSRF and the affected version range, but does not provide vulnerable endpoint details, exploit status, or a confirmed fix. Avoid assuming exploitability beyond the CVSS vector and validate only in authorized environments.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the PhonePe Payment Solutions plugin and installed version.
  • Check PhonePe or WordPress plugin guidance for an updated fixed release.
  • Disable or remove the plugin where it is not required for payment processing.
  • Restrict unnecessary outbound network access from WordPress hosting environments.
  • Prioritize review for public ecommerce sites using the affected plugin.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether the plugin slug phonepe-payment-solutions is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record the installed plugin version and flag versions 1.0.15 or earlier.
  • Review web and application logs for unusual server-initiated outbound request patterns.
  • Check hosting egress controls that limit access to internal-only services.
  • Document compensating controls if no vendor fix is available.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-918: Information exposure and cloud metadata lookup

Information exposure and SSRF weaknesses can make discovery, cloud metadata, and credential material review relevant. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Cloud metadata behavior lookup

The CVE wording references SSRF or metadata access, so cloud discovery and credential material review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-45835 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.8CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N3.91.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.8Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-45835Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
PhonePePhonePe Payment Solutionsphonepe-payment-solutions, n/aunaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-918 · source CWE mapping

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.