LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-45188: Netatalk through 3.1.13 has an afp_getappl heap-based buffer overflow resulting in code execution via a cra...

Netatalk through 3.1.13 has an afp_getappl heap-based buffer overflow resulting in code execution via a crafted .appl file. This provides remote root access on some platforms such as FreeBSD (used for TrueNAS).

HighCVSS 7.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Netatalk versions through 3.1.13 can mishandle a crafted .appl file and overflow heap memory. On some platforms, including FreeBSD-based TrueNAS deployments, this may allow code execution with root-level impact. Treat exposed AFP file-sharing systems as a priority to identify and update.

Executive priority

Prioritize remediation for internet-reachable or broadly accessible file-sharing systems. The business risk is unauthorized code execution on storage infrastructure, potentially with root privileges, which can affect confidentiality, integrity, and availability of shared data.

Technical view

CVE-2022-45188 is a CWE-122 heap-based buffer overflow in Netatalk afp_getappl triggered by a crafted .appl file. The CVSS 3.1 score is 7.8 with local attack vector and required user interaction, but the CVE description notes remote root impact on some platforms.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely on systems running Netatalk through 3.1.13, especially AFP file-sharing hosts, NAS appliances, FreeBSD-based TrueNAS environments, and Linux distributions that shipped vulnerable netatalk packages.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Public technical analysis exists, so defenders should assume exploit knowledge is available, but not claim in-the-wild exploitation from this bundle.

Researcher notes

The CVSS vector lists local access and user interaction, while the CVE text describes remote root on some platforms. Validate platform-specific attack conditions before ranking exposure. Avoid assuming all Netatalk deployments have identical privilege or reachability impact.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Netatalk to a fixed release such as 3.1.14 or later where available.
  • Apply distribution security updates from Debian, Fedora, Gentoo, or the relevant vendor.
  • Restrict AFP access to trusted networks while patching is pending.
  • Review NAS and TrueNAS vendor guidance for bundled Netatalk fixes.
  • Disable AFP where it is no longer required.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory hosts and appliances running Netatalk or AFP services.
  • Confirm installed Netatalk versions are later than 3.1.13 or vendor-patched.
  • Check whether AFP is reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Verify Debian, Fedora, Gentoo, or appliance security updates were applied.
  • Review file-sharing logs for unusual AFP activity around .appl files.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
9

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-122: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-45188 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
11Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-45188Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-122 · source CWE mapping

Heap-based Buffer Overflow

Heap-based Buffer Overflow represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.