LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-44741: WordPress Testimonial Slider plugin <= 1.3.1 - Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability leading to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in David Anderson Testimonial Slider plugin <= 1.3.1 on WordPress.

MediumCVSS 6.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-44741 affects the WordPress Testimonial Slider plugin through version 1.3.1. A malicious site could trick a logged-in WordPress user into taking an unintended action that leads to cross-site scripting. Business impact is usually limited, but public-facing WordPress sites using this plugin should treat it as a timely hygiene fix.

Executive priority

Handle as a moderate WordPress application risk. Prioritize internet-facing sites, marketing sites with many administrators, and environments where WordPress compromise would affect brand trust or customer data collection.

Technical view

The source bundle describes a CSRF weakness in David Anderson Testimonial Slider <=1.3.1 that can lead to XSS. CVSS 3.1 is 6.1 with network attack vector, low complexity, required user interaction, changed scope, and low confidentiality/integrity impact. The bundle does not identify a specific patched version or technical root cause details.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites with the David Anderson Testimonial Slider plugin installed at version 1.3.1 or earlier. Sites not using this plugin are not affected based on the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The CVE is not listed as CISA KEV in the bundle, and no cited source states active exploitation. Exploitation requires user interaction, likely involving a logged-in WordPress user being induced to visit attacker-controlled content.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse in the provided bundle. The public description confirms CSRF leading to XSS but does not provide affected code paths, nonce behavior, output context, exploit status, or a named fixed version. Avoid assuming stored versus reflected XSS without vendor details.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for Testimonial Slider plugin usage and version.
  • Check Patchstack, WordPress.org, and vendor guidance for a supported fixed release.
  • Update the plugin if a fixed supported version is available.
  • If no fixed version is available, disable or remove the plugin.
  • Restrict WordPress admin access to trusted users and sessions.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Testimonial Slider is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Verify installed plugin versions are greater than 1.3.1 or otherwise remediated.
  • Review testimonial content and plugin settings for unexpected script-like content.
  • Check WordPress audit logs for suspicious administrator-side changes.
  • Confirm compensating controls do not rely on public exploit assumptions.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-79: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-44741 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
6.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
6.1CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N2.82.7Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

6.1Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-44741Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
David AndersonTestimonial Slider (WordPress plugin)<= 1.3.1Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.

CWE-79 · source CWE mapping

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting')

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.