LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-44212: In GL.iNet Goodcloud 1.0, insecure design allows remote attacker to access devices' admin panel.

In GL.iNet Goodcloud 1.0, insecure design allows remote attacker to access devices' admin panel.

MediumCVSS 5.9Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-44212 describes an insecure design issue in GL.iNet Goodcloud 1.0 that could let a remote attacker reach a device admin panel. The main business risk is unauthorized visibility into device administration. Public metadata rates it medium, with high confidentiality impact but high attack complexity.

Executive priority

Treat this as a targeted management-plane exposure issue. Prioritize environments using GL.iNet Goodcloud 1.0 for remote device administration, especially where device admin panels protect sensitive network configuration.

Technical view

The CVE record maps this to CWE-284 and CVSS 3.1 score 5.9: network attack vector, high complexity, no privileges or user interaction, unchanged scope, high confidentiality impact, and no integrity or availability impact. The public affected-product metadata is incomplete, but the description names GL.iNet Goodcloud 1.0.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where GL.iNet Goodcloud 1.0 is used to manage devices and admin access can be reached remotely. The source bundle does not provide CPEs, full affected version ranges, or deployment conditions, so inventory confirmation is required.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not cite active exploitation, and CISA KEV status is false. The CVSS vector indicates remote unauthenticated reachability is possible, but high attack complexity reduces likelihood compared with easier management-plane flaws.

Researcher notes

Public data is sparse: no CPEs, no detailed affected matrix, and no patch version is included in the bundle. Avoid assuming broader GL.iNet product impact beyond Goodcloud 1.0 unless confirmed by vendor material.

Mitigation direction

  • Check GL.iNet vendor guidance for supported fixes or configuration changes.
  • Inventory GL.iNet Goodcloud 1.0 usage and managed device exposure.
  • Restrict access to administrative interfaces by network policy where feasible.
  • Review cloud-management settings against GL.iNet security advisory guidance.
  • Monitor administrative access logs for unexpected remote access patterns.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether GL.iNet Goodcloud 1.0 is present in the environment.
  • Identify devices managed through Goodcloud and their admin access paths.
  • Verify administrative interfaces are not broadly reachable from untrusted networks.
  • Review vendor advisory details against current firmware and cloud-management configuration.
  • Check logs for unexplained admin panel access around and after disclosure.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-284: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-44212 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.9 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.9CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N2.23.6Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.9Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-44212Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-284 · source CWE mapping

Improper Access Control

Improper Access Control represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.