LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-44211: In GL.iNet Goodcloud 1.1 Incorrect access control allows a remote attacker to access/change devices' settings.

In GL.iNet Goodcloud 1.1 Incorrect access control allows a remote attacker to access/change devices' settings.

HighCVSS 7.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-44211 is an access-control flaw in GL.iNet Goodcloud 1.1. A remote attacker could access or change device settings without needing an account, though the CVSS vector rates attack complexity as high. Business impact is mainly unauthorized configuration changes and exposure of sensitive device settings.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority where GL.iNet Goodcloud 1.1 manages business-critical devices. The likely risk is unauthorized configuration access or tampering, not confirmed widespread exploitation. Prioritize inventory confirmation, vendor guidance review, and monitoring for unexpected settings changes.

Technical view

The CVE describes incorrect access control, mapped to CWE-284, affecting GL.iNet Goodcloud 1.1. CVSS 3.1 is 7.4: network attack vector, no privileges, no user interaction, high confidentiality and integrity impact, no availability impact. The source bundle does not provide exploit mechanics, CPEs, or a confirmed patch.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where GL.iNet Goodcloud 1.1 is used to manage device settings. The CVE record’s structured affected product fields are n/a, so asset teams should verify scope against vendor records rather than assuming all GL.iNet products are affected.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not cite active exploitation, and KEV status is false. The record supports remote unauthenticated impact, but with high attack complexity. No exploit details or public exploitation claims are provided in the supplied sources.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse. The description names GL.iNet Goodcloud 1.1, but structured affected product and CPE fields are n/a. No fix, exploit status, or technical root-cause details are included in the supplied bundle. Validate scope directly with vendor advisory data.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any use of GL.iNet Goodcloud 1.1 in managed environments.
  • Check GL.iNet vendor guidance for fixed versions or recommended configuration changes.
  • Restrict administrative cloud access to trusted networks and accounts where possible.
  • Review and harden device-management permissions and account hygiene.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether GL.iNet Goodcloud 1.1 appears in asset inventory.
  • Review management logs for unexpected device-setting access or changes.
  • Compare current device settings against known-good baselines.
  • Track the GL.iNet advisory and CVE record for remediation details.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-284: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-44211 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.4CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N2.25.2Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.4High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-44211Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-284 · source CWE mapping

Improper Access Control

Improper Access Control represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.