LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-43566: Risky command safeguards bypass via Search ID query in Analytics Workspace in Splunk Enterprise

In Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.2.9, 8.1.12, and 9.0.2, an authenticated user can run risky commands using a more privileged user’s permissions to bypass SPL safeguards for risky commands https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/SplunkCloud/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards  in the Analytics Workspace. The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The attacker cannot exploit the vulnerability at will.

HighCVSS 7.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw lets a logged-in Splunk Enterprise user abuse a higher-privileged user’s browser action to run risky SPL commands despite safeguards. It is not an unauthenticated or fully at-will attack, but it can threaten sensitive data and integrity in vulnerable Splunk deployments.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority Splunk maintenance issue where vulnerable versions remain deployed. Business risk is strongest in environments where Splunk contains sensitive operational or security data and many users have interactive access.

Technical view

CVE-2022-43566 affects Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.1.12, 8.2.9, and 9.0.2. In Analytics Workspace, an authenticated attacker can bypass SPL risky-command safeguards by using a Search ID query and a phished victim request, executing with the victim’s higher permissions.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to Splunk Enterprise 8.1, 8.2, or 9.0 deployments below the fixed versions, especially where Analytics Workspace is available and users have differing privilege levels.

Exploitation context

The source says exploitation requires authentication and user interaction: the attacker must trick a victim into initiating a browser request. The attacker cannot exploit it at will. KEV is false, and the bundle provides no evidence of active exploitation.

Researcher notes

Key constraints matter: PR:L and UI:R, scope unchanged, high confidentiality and integrity impact, no availability impact in CVSS. The bundle identifies CWE-20 but does not provide detailed root-cause mechanics beyond Search ID query handling in Analytics Workspace.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected Splunk Enterprise instances to 8.1.12, 8.2.9, 9.0.2, or later.
  • Review Splunk SVD-2022-1106 for vendor-specific guidance and applicability.
  • Identify users with access to Analytics Workspace and higher-risk Splunk roles.
  • Reinforce phishing-resistant workflows for privileged Splunk users until upgrades are complete.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Splunk Enterprise versions and confirm whether any are below fixed releases.
  • Confirm whether Analytics Workspace is enabled or used in affected Splunk instances.
  • Review role assignments for privileged users who could be targeted.
  • Check Splunk logs for unusual risky SPL command activity by authenticated users.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-43566 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.3CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N2.15.2Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.3High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-43566Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SplunkSplunk Enterprise8.1, 8.2, 9.0affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.