LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-43563: Risky command safeguards bypass via rex search command field names in Splunk Enterprise

In Splunk Enterprise versions below 8.2.9 and 8.1.12, the way that the rex search command handles field names lets an attacker bypass SPL safeguards for risky commands https://docs.splunk.com/Documentation/SplunkCloud/latest/Security/SPLsafeguards . The vulnerability requires the attacker to phish the victim by tricking them into initiating a request within their browser. The attacker cannot exploit the vulnerability at will.

HighCVSS 8.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This flaw lets a phished user’s browser help bypass Splunk protections around risky SPL commands. It affects older Splunk Enterprise 8.1 and 8.2 releases. The attacker needs user interaction and cannot trigger it at will, but successful abuse could expose or alter high-value Splunk data.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority Splunk maintenance item where affected versions remain in service. The business risk is concentrated around privileged security data access, but exploitation depends on user interaction rather than unauthenticated direct compromise.

Technical view

CVE-2022-43563 is a CWE-20 input validation issue in how Splunk Enterprise’s rex search command handles field names. In affected versions, that handling can bypass SPL safeguards for risky commands. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.1, with high confidentiality and integrity impact and required user interaction.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to Splunk Enterprise 8.1 and 8.2 installations below 8.1.12 and 8.2.9. Systems used by administrators or analysts through browsers are the practical concern, especially where users can be phished into opening crafted requests.

Exploitation context

The source bundle says exploitation requires phishing a victim into initiating a browser request. It also says the attacker cannot exploit the vulnerability at will. KEV status is false, and the provided sources do not establish active exploitation.

Researcher notes

The public description identifies the vulnerable behavior but does not provide detailed exploit mechanics in the bundle. Focus assessment on version exposure, risky-command safeguard behavior, user interaction paths, and Splunk audit evidence. Avoid assuming broader Splunk products are affected.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade Splunk Enterprise 8.1 deployments to 8.1.12 or later.
  • Upgrade Splunk Enterprise 8.2 deployments to 8.2.9 or later.
  • Review Splunk advisory SVD-2022-1103 for vendor-specific guidance.
  • Reinforce phishing controls for users with Splunk access.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Splunk Enterprise versions across production, test, and disaster recovery systems.
  • Confirm no 8.1 deployment is below 8.1.12.
  • Confirm no 8.2 deployment is below 8.2.9.
  • Review Splunk audit activity for unusual risky-command searches or browser-initiated requests.
  • Validate risky command safeguards after patching in a controlled environment.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-20: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-43563 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N2.85.2Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-43563Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
SplunkSplunk Enterprise8.1, 8.2affected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-20 · source CWE mapping

Improper Input Validation

Improper Input Validation represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.