LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-4220: Chained Quiz <= 1.3.2.4 - Cross-Site Request Forgery to Question Deletion

The Chained Quiz plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.3.2.4. This is due to missing nonce validation on the list_questions() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete questions from quizzes via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

MediumCVSS 5.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-4220 lets an attacker trick a WordPress administrator into triggering deletion of Chained Quiz questions. The attacker does not need an account, but the attack depends on administrator interaction. Business impact is content loss or quiz disruption, not data theft based on the supplied sources.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate website integrity issue. Prioritize sites that rely on quizzes for revenue, training, lead capture, or compliance evidence. It is not described as data theft or server takeover in the supplied sources.

Technical view

Chained Quiz for WordPress through version 1.3.2.4 lacks nonce validation in list_questions(), creating a CSRF path to delete quiz questions. The CVSS 3.1 score is 5.4 with network attack vector, low complexity, no privileges, required user interaction, and low integrity and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites with the Chained Quiz plugin installed at versions up to and including 1.3.2.4. Sites not using this plugin are not exposed based on the supplied bundle.

Exploitation context

CISA KEV is false in the bundle, and no supplied source states active exploitation. The described attack requires deceiving a site administrator into performing an action that sends a forged request.

Researcher notes

The key condition is missing nonce validation in list_questions(). The source bundle identifies question deletion as the impact and administrator interaction as required. A public gist is referenced, but the bundle does not establish active exploitation.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for the Chained Quiz plugin and installed version.
  • Update Chained Quiz if vendor guidance provides a release newer than 1.3.2.4.
  • If no supported update is available, disable or remove the plugin.
  • Limit WordPress administrator access to trusted users.
  • Warn administrators against clicking unexpected links while authenticated.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether Chained Quiz is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Check plugin version and flag versions up to 1.3.2.4.
  • Review quiz question records for unexpected deletions or gaps.
  • Review WordPress admin activity around reported content loss.
  • Verify vendor or WordPress plugin guidance before declaring remediation complete.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-4220 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
6Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L2.82.5Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-4220Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
prasunsenChained Quiz0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.