LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-41685: Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Integration for Szamlazz.hu & WooCommerce and Csomagpontok és szállítási címkék WooCommerce hez plugins

Multiple Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Viszt Péter's Integration for Szamlazz.hu & WooCommerce plugin <= 5.6.3.2 and Csomagpontok és szállítási címkék WooCommerce-hez plugin <= 1.9.0.2 on WordPress.

MediumCVSS 5.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

This affects two Viszt Péter WooCommerce-related WordPress plugins used for Hungarian invoicing and shipping workflows. A logged-in administrator could be tricked into performing unintended actions through CSRF. Impact is limited, but it can alter plugin-related state or disrupt operations if vulnerable versions remain installed.

Executive priority

Treat as a moderate-priority WordPress ecommerce hygiene issue. Prioritize stores using Hungarian invoicing or pickup-point shipping workflows, especially where administrators routinely process orders and click external links.

Technical view

CVE-2022-41685 is multiple CSRF in Integration for Szamlazz.hu & WooCommerce <= 5.6.3.2 and Csomagpontok és szállítási címkék WooCommerce-hez <= 1.9.0.2. CVSS 3.1 is 5.4: network reachable, low complexity, no privileges required by attacker, but user interaction is required.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress/WooCommerce sites with either named plugin installed at or below the affected versions. Sites not using these plugins are not exposed based on the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or active exploitation evidence. CSRF requires an authenticated user, typically an administrator, to interact with attacker-controlled content or a malicious link.

Researcher notes

Evidence identifies affected products and version ceilings, but the bundle does not provide detailed vulnerable endpoints, exploit status, or fixed-version numbers. Keep validation focused on version inventory, vendor changelogs, and defensive CSRF control checks.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for both affected plugin names and versions.
  • Check vendor, WordPress.org, or Patchstack guidance for fixed releases.
  • Update beyond the affected versions where a vendor-supported release exists.
  • Disable or remove the plugin if it is not business-critical.
  • Restrict administrator browsing and email interaction until remediated.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed plugin versions are greater than the affected ranges.
  • Review WordPress.org plugin changelogs for CSRF-related fixes.
  • Check recent admin activity for unexpected plugin setting or workflow changes.
  • In staging, verify sensitive plugin actions require valid CSRF protection.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-41685 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
5.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
5.4CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L2.82.5Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

5.4Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-41685Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Viszt PéterIntegration for Szamlazz.hu & WooCommerce (WordPress plugin)<= 5.6.3.2Listed
Viszt PéterCsomagpontok és szállítási címkék WooCommerce-hez (WordPress plugin)<= 1.9.0.2Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.