LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-40817: Zammad 5.2.1 has a fine-grained permission model that allows to configure read-only access to tickets.

Zammad 5.2.1 has a fine-grained permission model that allows to configure read-only access to tickets. However, agents were still wrongly able to perform some operations on such tickets, like adding and removing links, tags. and related answers. This issue has been fixed in 5.2.2.

MediumCVSS 4.3Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysismoderate

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

Zammad 5.2.1 did not fully enforce read-only ticket access. An authenticated agent who should only view tickets could still change some ticket metadata, including links, tags, and related answers. The business impact is limited integrity risk, not data theft or outage, and the issue is reported fixed in Zammad 5.2.2.

Executive priority

Treat this as a moderate-priority maintenance and access-control issue. It is not described as remotely exploitable without credentials, but it can undermine ticket integrity where read-only access is part of operational control, audit separation, or customer support governance.

Technical view

CVE-2022-40817 is a CWE-732 permission enforcement flaw in Zammad 5.2.1. CVSS 3.1 is 4.3 with network access, low attack complexity, required low privileges, no user interaction, and low integrity impact only. The documented unauthorized operations are adding or removing ticket links, tags, and related answers.

Likely exposure

Exposure is most likely where Zammad 5.2.1 is deployed and read-only ticket permissions are used for agents. The source bundle does not identify affected CPEs, hosting models, or earlier versions, so scope beyond 5.2.1 should be confirmed from vendor guidance.

Exploitation context

The provided sources do not state active exploitation, and this CVE is not marked KEV. Abuse requires an authenticated agent-level context, not anonymous access. Impact is constrained to unauthorized ticket metadata or relationship changes documented by the advisory.

Researcher notes

The source evidence is narrow but consistent: the flaw concerns incomplete enforcement of fine-grained ticket permissions. Focus validation on authorization boundaries around ticket link, tag, and related-answer operations. Do not assume broader ticket edit capability or data disclosure without additional vendor evidence.

Mitigation direction

  • Upgrade affected Zammad 5.2.1 systems to version 5.2.2 or later.
  • Review the Zammad advisory before making production changes.
  • Audit roles that rely on read-only ticket permissions.
  • Review recent ticket link, tag, and related-answer changes by read-only agents.
  • Restrict agent accounts that do not require ticket access.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory Zammad instances and confirm whether version 5.2.1 is present.
  • Check whether read-only ticket permissions are configured for agents.
  • Confirm fixed behavior on 5.2.2 or later in a controlled test environment.
  • Review logs or audit history for unauthorized ticket metadata changes.
  • Document any affected workflows that depended on read-only ticket integrity.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-732: Authorization and privilege behavior lookup

Authorization weaknesses can support privilege escalation and valid-account review, depending on exploit path. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-40817 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Medium
CVSS
4.3 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
4.3CVSS 3.1MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N2.81.4Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

4.3Medium
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-40817Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-732 · source CWE mapping

Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource

Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.