LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-4023: 3DPrint < 3.5.6.9 - CSRF to arbitrary file downlad

The 3DPrint WordPress plugin before 3.5.6.9 does not protect against CSRF attacks in the modified version of Tiny File Manager included with the plugin, allowing an attacker to craft a malicious request that will create an archive of any files or directories on the target server by tricking a logged in admin into submitting a form. Furthermore the created archive has a predictable location and name, allowing the attacker to download the file if they know the time at which the form was submitted, making it possible to leak sensitive files like the WordPress configuration containing database credentials and secrets.

UnknownCVSS not scoredNot KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-4023 affects the 3DPrint WordPress plugin before 3.5.6.9. A malicious site could trick a logged-in WordPress administrator into causing the plugin’s bundled file manager to archive server files, then allow download of that archive. Sensitive files such as WordPress configuration could be exposed.

Executive priority

Treat this as high priority for affected WordPress sites because it can expose database credentials and application secrets. Remediation is straightforward if the plugin can be upgraded, but suspected exposure should trigger credential rotation and incident review.

Technical view

The issue is a CSRF flaw in a modified Tiny File Manager bundled with 3DPrint. The vulnerable flow can create an archive of arbitrary files or directories on the target server. Because the archive location and name are predictable, an attacker who knows the submission time may retrieve it.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to WordPress sites running the 3DPrint plugin before 3.5.6.9, especially where administrators browse while authenticated. The provided data does not identify broader affected products or exact vulnerable configurations beyond that plugin version range.

Exploitation context

WPScan tags the issue with exploit information, but the supplied bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation in the wild. Exploitation depends on inducing an authenticated administrator to submit a malicious request.

Researcher notes

The evidence supports CSRF leading to archive creation and potential arbitrary file disclosure through predictable archive retrieval. CVSS is not provided in the bundle. No KEV status or in-the-wild exploitation evidence is provided.

Mitigation direction

  • Update 3DPrint to version 3.5.6.9 or later.
  • Disable the plugin if an immediate update is not available.
  • Review vendor and plugin guidance for any additional cleanup steps.
  • Rotate database credentials and WordPress secrets if file exposure is suspected.
  • Remove unexpected archives created by the plugin file-manager component.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory WordPress sites for 3DPrint plugin versions before 3.5.6.9.
  • Confirm administrators cannot access the vulnerable bundled file manager version.
  • Review web logs for suspicious archive downloads after administrator sessions.
  • Search server storage for unexpected archives created by the plugin.
  • Check whether sensitive files were included in any discovered archive.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
4

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Database behavior lookup

The CVE wording references database injection or access, so collection and exfiltration review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

File access behavior lookup

The CVE wording references file access or upload behavior, so file telemetry and web shell review may help. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-4023 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
Unknown
CVSS
Not scored
Known Exploited
No
Published
Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

0CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
3Source links

CVSS and timeline data

No CVSS vectors or timeline events were available in the normalized CVE source material.

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Unknown3dprint0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.