LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-40192: WordPress wpForo Forum plugin <= 2.0.9 - Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in wpForo Forum plugin <= 2.0.9 on WordPress.

HighCVSS 7.1Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-40192 affects the wpForo Forum WordPress plugin through version 2.0.9. It is a CSRF issue, meaning an attacker may trick a logged-in user into causing an unintended forum action. The listed impact is high mainly because availability can be heavily affected.

Executive priority

Treat as a high-priority WordPress plugin exposure if wpForo is installed. The issue needs prompt inventory and vendor-guided update, but the provided evidence does not support claiming active exploitation or a universal emergency response.

Technical view

The CVE records CWE-352 in gVectors Team wpForo Forum for WordPress <= 2.0.9. CVSS 3.1 is 7.1 with network attack vector, low complexity, no attacker privileges, user interaction required, unchanged scope, no confidentiality impact, low integrity impact, and high availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running wpForo Forum plugin version 2.0.9 or earlier. Risk is most relevant where privileged WordPress or forum users browse while authenticated. The bundle does not identify affected configurations beyond the plugin version range.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited active exploitation. The CVSS vector requires user interaction but no attacker privileges. No public exploit details are included in the provided sources, so exploitation status should be treated as unconfirmed from this evidence.

Researcher notes

Evidence is limited to the CVE metadata and Patchstack reference in the bundle. The record identifies CSRF class, affected plugin, affected versions, CWE, and CVSS vector, but does not provide vulnerable endpoint details, exploit primitives, or explicit fixed-version text in the supplied content.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for wpForo Forum plugin versions <= 2.0.9.
  • Check Patchstack and vendor guidance for the fixed or recommended release.
  • Upgrade affected installations to a non-affected supported version when vendor guidance confirms it.
  • Reduce exposure of administrative sessions and enforce least-privilege WordPress accounts.
  • Monitor wpForo and WordPress logs for unexpected forum or administrative changes.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm installed wpForo Forum version from WordPress plugin inventory.
  • Compare the installed version against the affected range: <= 2.0.9.
  • Review vendor or Patchstack advisory for patch status and remediation notes.
  • Check whether privileged users recently reported suspicious prompts or unexpected forum changes.
  • Verify no affected plugin copy remains on staging, backup, or secondary WordPress sites.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-40192 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.1 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.1CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H2.84.2Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.1High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-40192Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
gVectors TeamwpForo Forum (WordPress plugin)<= 2.0.9Listed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.