LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-38932: readelf in ToaruOS 2.0.1 has a global overflow allowing RCE when parsing a crafted ELF file.

readelf in ToaruOS 2.0.1 has a global overflow allowing RCE when parsing a crafted ELF file.

HighCVSS 8.4Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

ToaruOS 2.0.1 includes a vulnerable readelf tool that can overflow global memory while parsing a crafted ELF file. If an affected system processes a hostile file with this tool, the reported impact is remote code execution, despite the CVSS vector describing local attack conditions.

Executive priority

Treat as high priority only where ToaruOS 2.0.1 is present or used for file inspection. For most enterprises, urgency is likely constrained by ToaruOS’s niche footprint, but impacted systems should not process untrusted ELF files until clarified or fixed.

Technical view

CVE-2022-38932 is reported as CWE-787 out-of-bounds write in readelf for ToaruOS 2.0.1. The issue is triggered during crafted ELF parsing and carries CVSS 3.1 score 8.4 with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact. Structured affected-product metadata is incomplete.

Likely exposure

Exposure is likely limited to environments using ToaruOS 2.0.1 and invoking its readelf against untrusted or user-supplied ELF files. The source bundle does not identify other affected products, CPEs, or packaged downstream versions.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or cited evidence of active exploitation. The risk comes from malicious file parsing: exploitation would require the affected readelf to process a crafted ELF file in a local or workflow context.

Researcher notes

The public record is sparse. The CVE states RCE from a global overflow in readelf, but the bundle does not provide patch details, exploit status, or complete affected CPE metadata. Validate exposure from actual ToaruOS usage rather than product-name matching alone.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify any ToaruOS 2.0.1 systems or images in use.
  • Avoid parsing untrusted ELF files with ToaruOS readelf.
  • Isolate file-analysis workflows that must handle untrusted ELF samples.
  • Check upstream ToaruOS guidance or issue tracking for a confirmed fix.
  • Update or rebuild affected systems when an official fix is available.

Validation and detection

  • Inventory ToaruOS deployments and confirm whether version 2.0.1 is present.
  • Confirm whether readelf is installed or used in analyst, CI, or file-inspection workflows.
  • Review workflows for user-supplied, downloaded, or externally received ELF files.
  • Track the linked upstream issue for fix status and affected-version clarification.
  • Document compensating controls if the tool cannot be removed or updated.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-787: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
description · low confidence lookup

Execution behavior lookup

The CVE wording references code or command execution, so execution technique review may help defensive triage. This is a Glexia inferred lookup path, not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, or CVE Program mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-38932 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.4 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.4CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.55.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.4High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-38932Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone

Source materials

Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
n/an/an/aListed
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-787 · source CWE mapping

Out-of-bounds Write

Out-of-bounds Write represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.