LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-38691: In BootROM, there is a possible missing validation for Certificate Type 0.

In BootROM, there is a possible missing validation for Certificate Type 0. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed.

HighCVSS 7.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-38691 is a high-severity BootROM validation issue in listed Unisoc chipsets. A local attacker with low privileges could potentially gain higher privileges on an affected device. The sources do not show active exploitation or a named patch, so urgency depends on whether your device fleet uses these SoCs.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority hardware-platform exposure review, not a broad internet-facing emergency. Focus first on fleets using listed Unisoc chipsets, especially unmanaged, shared, or physically exposed devices.

Technical view

The CVE describes missing validation for Certificate Type 0 in BootROM, mapped to CWE-250. CVSS 3.1 is 7.8 with local attack vector, low complexity, low privileges required, no user interaction, and high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited by the provided affected list: Unisoc SC9863A, T310, T610, and T618. The bundle does not identify specific phone, IoT, or embedded product models, so asset confirmation requires OEM or procurement mapping.

Exploitation context

Active exploitation is not established. The source bundle marks KEV as false and provides no cited claim of in-the-wild exploitation. The attack context is local, not remote, based on the CVSS vector.

Researcher notes

Evidence is sparse in the CVE record: affected SoCs, BootROM location, Certificate Type 0 validation, local privilege escalation, and CVSS are stated. No patch details, exploit maturity, or product-model mapping are provided in the bundle.

Mitigation direction

  • Identify devices using the listed Unisoc SoCs.
  • Check Unisoc and device OEM guidance for remediation status.
  • Apply OEM firmware or platform updates when available.
  • Prioritize controls that reduce local attacker access to affected devices.
  • Track unsupported affected devices for replacement or risk acceptance.

Validation and detection

  • Map device models to underlying SoC identifiers.
  • Confirm whether SC9863A, T310, T610, or T618 are present.
  • Review vendor advisories for CVE-2022-38691 applicability.
  • Check firmware build status against OEM remediation guidance.
  • Document devices where vendor fix information is unavailable.
Prepared
Confidence
medium
Sources
3

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · low confidence lookup

CWE-250: Exact CWE lookup

Use the exact CWE identifier as the starting point before reviewing related ATT&CK behavior. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-38691 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
7.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
2Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
7.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H1.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

7.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-38691Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
Unisoc (Shanghai) Technologies Co., Ltd.SC9863A//T310/T610/T618//unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-250 · source CWE mapping

Execution with Unnecessary Privileges

Execution with Unnecessary Privileges represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.