LiveActive security incident?Get immediate response
CVE Record

CVE-2022-3852: VR Calendar <= 2.3.3 - Cross-Site Request Forgery

The VR Calendar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 2.3.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete, and modify calendars as well as the plugin settings, via forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.

HighCVSS 8.8Not KEV-listedUpdated
Glexia's TakeAutomated analysishigh

Security readout for executives and security teams

Plain-English summary

CVE-2022-3852 affects the VR Calendar WordPress plugin through version 2.3.3. A malicious site or link could cause a logged-in administrator to unknowingly change plugin settings or modify/delete calendars. The issue depends on administrator interaction, but impact is high because site content and configuration can be changed.

Executive priority

Treat this as a high-priority WordPress plugin remediation if VR Calendar is present. It is not confirmed as actively exploited in the supplied sources, but administrator-assisted compromise could alter site data and settings.

Technical view

The vulnerability is cross-site request forgery caused by missing or incorrect nonce validation in several VR Calendar administrative functions. Sources describe unauthenticated attackers inducing an administrator action to perform state-changing operations, including calendar deletion, calendar modification, and plugin setting changes. The CVSS v3.1 score is 8.8.

Likely exposure

Exposure is limited to WordPress sites running VR Calendar versions up to and including 2.3.3. Sites without this plugin, or not using the affected versions, are not indicated as exposed by the provided sources.

Exploitation context

The source bundle does not show CISA KEV listing or confirmed active exploitation. Successful abuse requires a site administrator to be authenticated and tricked into taking an action such as clicking a link.

Researcher notes

The key weakness is CWE-352. Public references point to Wordfence, the WordPress plugin Trac source, and a changeset, but the prompt bundle does not name a specific fixed version. Avoid assuming patch details beyond the stated affected range.

Mitigation direction

  • Inventory WordPress sites for VR Calendar or vr-calendar-sync.
  • If running version 2.3.3 or older, prioritize upgrade or removal.
  • Check vendor and WordPress plugin guidance for the confirmed fixed release.
  • Restrict administrator browsing and access while remediation is pending.
  • Review calendar and plugin settings for unexpected changes.

Validation and detection

  • Confirm whether VR Calendar is installed on each WordPress site.
  • Record the installed plugin version and compare against 2.3.3 or older.
  • Review administrative functions for nonce validation on state-changing actions.
  • Check site logs and change history for unexpected calendar or settings changes.
  • Verify remediation against vendor or WordPress plugin release guidance.
Prepared
Confidence
high
Sources
6

Generated from the cited source records. This long-tail analysis has not been individually reviewed by a named human.

Potential ATT&CK relevance

Conservative CVE-to-ATT&CK context

These mappings and lookup hints may be relevant to the vulnerability behavior, CWE, affected product, or exposure path. Glexia-inferred context is not an official MITRE, ATT&CK, CWE, or CVE Program mapping.

ATT&CK lookup starting points

Use these exact CWE pages and searches to review the Glexia ATT&CK library from this CVE's weakness and description context.

cwe · medium confidence lookup

CWE-352: User-session and phishing behavior lookup

Client-side and session-facing weaknesses should be reviewed alongside initial-access and user-execution behaviors. Open the exact CWE lookup page first, then review the ATT&CK searches from that MITRE weakness context. This is a Glexia lookup hint, not an official ATT&CK mapping.

Open ATT&CK lookup
cve · low confidence lookup

CVE-2022-3852 mapping review

Open the CVE-to-ATT&CK bridge for reviewed, inferred, or future official mappings tied to this CVE.

Open ATT&CK lookup
Vulnerability profileCVE Program record
Severity
High
CVSS
8.8 (3.1)
Known Exploited
No
Published

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Official CVE source material

CNA and ADP enrichment extracted from CVE v5

These fields come from the CVE record and ADP containers, not from Glexia's Take. They preserve time-varying source decisions such as CISA SSVC, KEV status, CVSS metrics, and provider references.

1CVSS vectors
0Timeline events
0ADP providers
5Source links

CVSS vector scores

1 official score

We collect every scored CVSS vector available in the official CNA and ADP containers. When more than one version is present, the table keeps the source vectors side by side instead of collapsing them into the highest score.

ScoreVersionSeverityVectorExploitImpactSource
8.8CVSS 3.1HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H2.85.9Primary CVE score

Vulnerability scoring details

Base CVSS 3.1 score

8.8High
CVSS 3.1 vector shape for CVE-2022-3852Attack VectorAttack ComplexityPrivileges RequiredUser InteractionScopeConfidentiality ImpactIntegrity ImpactAvailability Impact

Vector: CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Attack Vector
NetworkAdjacentLocalPhysical
Attack Complexity
LowHigh
Privileges Required
NoneLowHigh
User Interaction
NoneRequired
Scope
ChangedUnchanged
Confidentiality Impact
HighLowNone
Integrity Impact
HighLowNone
Availability Impact
HighLowNone
Affected products

Products and packages named in the record

VendorProductVersion / packageStatus
innate-images-llcVR Calendar0unaffected
Weakness

CWE details

CWE links open Glexia weakness intelligence pages with official CWE context, developer remediation guidance, and related CVE mappings.

CWE-352 · source CWE mapping

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) represents a recurring weakness pattern that can create exploitable paths when design, validation, or implementation controls are missing.